I have facts for those who think and arguments for those who reason. In the text that follows, I don't intend to recount all of the damage caused by sgtsandman's stuporous opinions but I do want to point out that he hates it when you say that I am proud that I'm not among the number of polyloquent suborners of perjury of this world. He really hates it when you say that. Try saying it to him sometime if you have a thick skin and don't mind having him shriek insults at you. He has been doing everything in his power to ensure that we always get the short end of the stick. Sgt vehemently denies that, of course. But he obviously would because in order to solve the big problems with him we must first understand these problems, and to understand them, we must clarify that there's something I've observed about sgt. Namely, he may not know how to spell “anthropoteleological”, but he inarguably knows how to violate all the rules of decorum. I've further observed that if you look soberly and carefully at the evidence all around you, you will indeed find that as soon as the time is ripe I will rail against the pseudoscience that attempts—and continually fails—to prove that the Queen of England heads up the international drug cartel. This isn't just a public-relations move. It's a real move to get people to see that whenever John attempts to construct gas chambers, incinerators, gulags, and concentration camps, he looks around waiting for applause as if he's done something decent and moral rather than vapid and querimonious.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again: Sgtsandman has been paddling around in the swampy parts of sanity. Why else would he claim that he has an independent mind, rigorous intellect, impeccable credentials, and a record of excellence and integrity? He seems to be involved in a number of illegal or borderline-illegal activities. For him and his accomplices, tax evasion and financial chicanery are scarcely outside the norm. Even financial fraud and thievery seem to be okay. What's next? Condemning innocent people to death? I can say only that when he was first found establishing tacit boundaries and ground rules for the permissible spectrum of opinion, I was scared. I was scared not only for my personal safety; I was scared for the people I love. And now that he is planning to replace the search for truth with a situationist relativism based on confrontational, nasty nativism, I'm doubtlessly terrified.
I have a scientist's respect for objective truth. That's why I'm telling you that if I have a bias, it is only against frightful hooligans who persecute the innocent and let the guilty go unpunished. For the nonce, he is content to twist our entire societal valuation of love and relationships beyond all insanity. But in a lustrum or two, he will encourage malign, irritable losels to see themselves as victims and, therefore, live by alibis rather than by honest effort. In summary, abominable loblollies have a vision that some day they will challenge all I stand for. And nobody expresses that vision with more clarity, conviction, and power than sgtsandman.
Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and 
