• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

2.9 turbo vs. v-8


twistednturned

New Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2011
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
kentwood,Mich.
Vehicle Year
1990
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9
Transmission
Automatic
I`m thinking about buying a turbo for my 2.9 it`s my D.D so i kinda want to keep my gas mileage, i know i will lose it with a v-8. i`ve been reading for weeks about turbos an for the price of a turbo kit an making a turbo manifold becsuse i cant find one for a 2.9, my 2.9 is stock just have hearers, an i want more power like v-8 power but what i have been reading is that unless my motor is built somewhat i mite only get 20 hp at 10lbs of boost even thou the turbo maker says 250hp to 400hp at 8lbs of boost. is this true ???? i`m now thinking if it is an the price of the whole turbo kit i mite be better off just going with a v-8.
 


RangerSVT

Oct 09 OTOTM
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
Solid Axle Swap
RBV's on Boost
ASE Certified Tech
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Mar 15, 2009
Messages
7,883
Reaction score
53
Points
48
Location
TRS since 2002 - NW KY
Vehicle Year
19962002
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
GT-40 5.0L EFI W/AC
Transmission
Automatic
The 2.9L will not handle boost levels about 5 psi without mods (not safely and reliably) And the price of doing a V8 swap is not much at all, probably half the price of a 2.9L rebuild (at least for me it was)
SVT
 

Sunk

New Member
Supporting Member
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Aug 19, 2007
Messages
6,657
Reaction score
125
Points
0
Age
35
Location
Everett, WA
Vehicle Year
2012
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
3.5 Eco
Transmission
Automatic
There's a reason you can't find anything to turbo a 2.9. Now a 2.3T on the other hand...
 

4.0B2

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
10,700
Reaction score
151
Points
63
Location
Walls, MS
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0 v6
Transmission
Automatic
4.0 swap or v8

now if you want turbo, the 4 cyc could be fun and good...

but i'd do the 4.0 or v8
 

RangerBoy94

Active Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
1,403
Reaction score
24
Points
38
Location
Northern California
Vehicle Year
1968
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
360CDI
Transmission
Automatic
4.0 ftw. You'll easily get 20 mpg.
 

4.0B2

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
10,700
Reaction score
151
Points
63
Location
Walls, MS
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0 v6
Transmission
Automatic
i get 21-22 on the interstate, cruise on 72ish

that's with 3.73's, a4ld, and 30's(ish)
 

straycat

New Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Oct 6, 2009
Messages
5,733
Reaction score
77
Points
0
Vehicle Year
02 06 and 2012
Make / Model
Jeeps
Transmission
Automatic
If you are going to swap out a motor...might as well do a V8 swap. I have not seen a complete turbo kit for the 2.8-2.9 L motor as of yet. I have seen non-complete kits that you need to buy extras for but that will cost way too much in the long run....you buy the turbo, and then buy the extras like the plumbing and the inter-cooler and mounting kit.
 

RustedRanger

New Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
829
Reaction score
5
Points
0
Location
Farmland IN
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9L
Transmission
Manual
A V-8 doesn't mean you will kill the mpg's. It would if you used a big cam, carb,and have low rear gears, but if it is a mild V-8 you will probably see a mpg increase over the 2.9. back in 86,87 the Mustang GT's were getting 24-26 mpg.
 

BlueChariot

New Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2011
Messages
1,150
Reaction score
28
Points
0
Age
32
Location
Thomasville, Georgia
Vehicle Year
'94
Make / Model
Mazda
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Automatic
A V-8 doesn't mean you will kill the mpg's. It would if you used a big cam, carb,and have low rear gears, but if it is a mild V-8 you will probably see a mpg increase over the 2.9. back in 86,87 the Mustang GT's were getting 24-26 mpg.
Thats essentially the point I was going to make. The Ranger I had with it's 3.0 got roughly 15 city and 20 highway, whereas my dad's Marquis with it's 2ton+ curbweight and it's bigger V8 got a few miles more per gallon.
 
Last edited:

heptofite

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
1,697
Reaction score
62
Points
48
Vehicle Year
2019
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
no reason you can't turbo a 2.9, no reason at all.

if that's what you want to do, don't let the naysayers stop you.

a turbo 2.9 will outperform a turbo 2.3 ten times out of ten.
 

country0001

Active Member
TRS Banner 2010-2011
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
2,512
Reaction score
14
Points
38
Age
49
Location
Stillwater, OK
Vehicle Year
1990,92
Make / Model
Ford,Ford
Engine Size
4.0,5.0
Transmission
Manual
i get 21-22 on the interstate, cruise on 72ish

that's with 3.73's, a4ld, and 30's(ish)
+1

I have a M5OD tho. 20 mpg aint bad in a B2
 

fastpakr

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
U.S. Military - Veteran
V8 Engine Swap
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
7,991
Reaction score
2,793
Points
113
Location
Roanoke, VA
Vehicle Year
1999
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
285/75-16
no reason you can't turbo a 2.9, no reason at all.

if that's what you want to do, don't let the naysayers stop you.

a turbo 2.9 will outperform a turbo 2.3 ten times out of ten.
:annoyed:
 

jhammel85

Guest
Power wise, I think you might as well go the V8 route or even the 4.0 route. Frankly, if it's your DD, I feel that you would run into more issues than needed when it comes to something you rely on everyday. That's for turboing the 2.9 / 4.0 or V8 swap.

no reason you can't turbo a 2.9, no reason at all.

if that's what you want to do, don't let the naysayers stop you.

a turbo 2.9 will outperform a turbo 2.3 ten times out of ten.
I can understand being hesitant about turboing a 2.9 and I've seen it done on here before with good results (IIRC). However, I feel that honestly the 2.9 is doing the best it can in it's stock form.

I don't know about beating out a 2.3 though....
Where'd you get that from? Not being an ass, I'm serious..
 
Last edited:

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Members online

No members online now.

Today's birthdays

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Latest posts

Truck of The Month


Kirby N.
March Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top