misterW
Member
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2010
- Messages
- 90
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 8
- Vehicle Year
- 1994
- Make / Model
- Ford
- Transmission
- Manual
Anybody run into this? I have a 1991 3.0. I have had a variety of 2nd generation 2.3s and dropped transmissions every few months it seemed, and I thought the hydraulic line fitting with the clip worked fine (at least compared to the one they used to have where you pushed down the white plastic collar). Generally went on and off quite easily in a matter of seconds.
Went to remove the transmission of this 3.0 and see that the disconnect seems a bit further inside the access hole than I remember. Then I start taking it off and WTF? The clip is literally at the same level as the edge of the hole (which is smaller than I remember), which obstructs the clip and prevents it from being slid off. Tried rotating the fitting around to slide the clip in the other direction where there is a tiny bit more room, but it does not want to turn. I"m giving it one more shot, then taking the master cylinder off with it, I guess. If it protruded from the hole just a quarter of an inch more, it would be totally fine.
Have any of you run into this? LIke I said, this is my first time doing this with a 3.0 and I am curious: Is this typical? Or hopefully some older slave cylinder is installed that they made with a longer tube after many complaints?
Went to remove the transmission of this 3.0 and see that the disconnect seems a bit further inside the access hole than I remember. Then I start taking it off and WTF? The clip is literally at the same level as the edge of the hole (which is smaller than I remember), which obstructs the clip and prevents it from being slid off. Tried rotating the fitting around to slide the clip in the other direction where there is a tiny bit more room, but it does not want to turn. I"m giving it one more shot, then taking the master cylinder off with it, I guess. If it protruded from the hole just a quarter of an inch more, it would be totally fine.
Have any of you run into this? LIke I said, this is my first time doing this with a 3.0 and I am curious: Is this typical? Or hopefully some older slave cylinder is installed that they made with a longer tube after many complaints?