• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

Symmetric vs asymmetric tread


Blmpkn

Toilet enthusiast
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2020
Messages
5,497
Reaction score
6,350
Points
113
Location
Southern maine
Vehicle Year
2023
Make / Model
Ford Bronco
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5"
Tire Size
285/75/18
My credo
Its probably better to be self deprecating than self defecating.
It's not worth it from a performance only standpoint, no. It pretty much just opens up a lot of options for tires... and that alone could make it worth it for the right person. Variety is the spice of life right? Plus.. depending on how long a set of tires lasts you.. there might not be ANY 15" tires that you find appealing by the next time you need to buy some.

Wheels also don't need to cost 1000$. A set of steelies shouldn't be much more than 500$ brand new. Another option would be to browse your local marketplaces for a set of used wheels. 5x4.5 is a pretty common bolt pattern, it won't be hard to find wheels that would work. I recently bought a set of 4 brand new/take-off 17" aluminum wheels for 100$.. the deals are out there.

An exact matching spare wheel/tire also isn't completely necessary. To me.. a spare is meant to be on the vehicle for as short of a time as possible.. so it's a waste of money in my eyes to spend whatever amount of extra money it costs for a 5th wheel and fancier than necessary tire just to have it in use for a couple days at best.
 


Ranger850

Doesn't get Sarcasm . . .
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Jan 24, 2018
Messages
8,426
Reaction score
4,664
Points
113
Location
Tallahassee Florida
Vehicle Year
2001
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
Born with a 3.0, looking for a donor V8
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
Stock 2"
Tire Size
Stock
My credo
Doing things wrong, until I get it right.
Bigger rims also allow for faster cooling of the brakes.
Yes, 18" are an option and even standard on "some" Rangers, Mavericks & F-150's, but when you opt for the FX4 package, you automatically get the 17", unless you FURTHER option the truck for the bigger 18". I know there are already a lot of modded Mavericks with big aftermarket rims, so You could start looking for a set of Maverick take-offs on CL, FBMarket, LetGo, and any other place/app that resale car stuff. I think the maverick has the same 5 lug pattern as the old Rangers.
 

James Morse

1997 XLT 4.0L 4x4 1999 Mazda B3000 2wd
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2021
Messages
1,891
Reaction score
973
Points
113
Location
Roanoke VA
Vehicle Year
1997 and 1999
Make / Model
XLT 4x4 & B3000
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0L in XLT, 3.0L in B3000
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31x10.5-15 K02's on the Ranger, 235/75R15 on Mazda
My credo
The perfect is the enemy of the good.
2022 FORD MAVERICK LARIAT 18” WHEELS RIMS GLOSS BLACK OEM FACTORY 95266 SET OF 4 | eBay

I have those huge hub caps and front hubs sticking out does that all fit ok? Trying to picture it.
I don't particularly like that pattern but there are surely others and probably cheaper.

Thanks. I think it'd look great with larger wheels.
I don't know what is the width of them have to check.

I think bolt pattern might be different I am 5x4.5 I think and some are 5x108 which would be 4.25 ?
 

James Morse

1997 XLT 4.0L 4x4 1999 Mazda B3000 2wd
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2021
Messages
1,891
Reaction score
973
Points
113
Location
Roanoke VA
Vehicle Year
1997 and 1999
Make / Model
XLT 4x4 & B3000
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0L in XLT, 3.0L in B3000
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31x10.5-15 K02's on the Ranger, 235/75R15 on Mazda
My credo
The perfect is the enemy of the good.
Hub bore is what I was talking about.
New Rangers have different bolt pattern so do Mavericks unless I'm mistaken. Rangers, 6 bolts, Mavericks, 4.25 vs 4.5 bolt pattern
Too bad
 

Blmpkn

Toilet enthusiast
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2020
Messages
5,497
Reaction score
6,350
Points
113
Location
Southern maine
Vehicle Year
2023
Make / Model
Ford Bronco
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5"
Tire Size
285/75/18
My credo
Its probably better to be self deprecating than self defecating.
"New" wheels like what's on the 2019+ rangers and the Maverick generally have a lot more backspacing than the wheels that are on a 90s ranger, meaning you'd have to run wheel spacers to get them out to where they need to be. This isn't a huge issue.

Much like regular spacers though (and they double as spacers)... are hub adapters.. they'll allow you to run whatever bolt pattern you desire.
 

85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
32,206
Reaction score
17,520
Points
113
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
I wouldn't bother with spacers.

Nothing wrong with 15's or 16's. I think they look the best on small Rangers... or really on anything.

17" is as big as is really practical if you intend to air down. They come bigger and whatever. Most "offroad" (FX4 etc) packages are mainly stickers and crap.

The biggest baddest Raptors and Broncos still ride on 17's.
 

ericbphoto

Overlander in development
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Feb 7, 2016
Messages
15,213
Reaction score
16,346
Points
113
Age
59
Location
Wellford, SC
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3.0L
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6"
Tire Size
35"
My credo
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are different.
Nothing wrong with 15's or 16's. I think they look the best on small Rangers... or really on anything.
You could have just said this without all the extraneous verbosity. Really. 15's are where it's at. With lots of big cushiony air filled rubber wrapped around them. Big tires. Small wheels.
 

85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
32,206
Reaction score
17,520
Points
113
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
You could have just said this without all the extraneous verbosity. Really. 15's are where it's at. With lots of big cushiony air filled rubber wrapped around them. Big tires. Small wheels.
In the land of ginormous disk brakes they don't always work anymore.

We just put brakes on a Tahoe the other day that had 16.25" diameter ROTORS.
 

James Morse

1997 XLT 4.0L 4x4 1999 Mazda B3000 2wd
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2021
Messages
1,891
Reaction score
973
Points
113
Location
Roanoke VA
Vehicle Year
1997 and 1999
Make / Model
XLT 4x4 & B3000
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0L in XLT, 3.0L in B3000
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31x10.5-15 K02's on the Ranger, 235/75R15 on Mazda
My credo
The perfect is the enemy of the good.
I guess you could put hub adapters and go to a 6-lug pattern and put the larger wheels. But now I'm thinking, it's not worth it.
How much do you air down? Seems like maybe something you'd do and also disconnect front stabilizer?
 

James Morse

1997 XLT 4.0L 4x4 1999 Mazda B3000 2wd
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2021
Messages
1,891
Reaction score
973
Points
113
Location
Roanoke VA
Vehicle Year
1997 and 1999
Make / Model
XLT 4x4 & B3000
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0L in XLT, 3.0L in B3000
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31x10.5-15 K02's on the Ranger, 235/75R15 on Mazda
My credo
The perfect is the enemy of the good.
I found another symmetric tire, the RPB Repulsor - more a mud tire than a/t though I think.

I neglected to mention in the types of tread patterns, I'd mentioned it before in another thread, but there's one other tread pattern that is not strictly speaking symmetric; the two sides of the tire are mirrors, but the halves are rotated a bit respective to each other. That's a tire that will appear the same on both sides of the truck.

Custom Offsets seems to have great lists of tires, seems like their filters are a bit weird, but there's tons to look at.

I believe the reason almost all tires have a mirrored but flipped pattern is then you only have to make the mold for one half (make two of them) then flip it over for the other half of the tire. I'd say 95% or more of tread patterns are such at least in a/t and mudders. When you make a symmetric tire you have to make two mold halves different so it doubles the work of mold-making so that's probably why you see them like that.

As a general rule, tires will never appear the same side-to-side on the truck, meaning, they'll never be mirror images of each other in other words symmetric with respect to the centerline of the truck. There are very few exceptions. It's just something I never noticed before so was/am on a mission to find them, if they exist.

Here's Repulsor and also Crosswind MT you see they are not strictly speaking symmetric, but, it's just offset mirror sides, so they would qualify as symmetric.
They probably aren't good choices for me although the Replusor is supposed to be pretty quiet on the road.
RBP Repulsor MT 31x10.50R15LT | RBPMT15105010 | Custom Offsets (customwheeloffset.com)
couldn't get pic of the above
and the Crosswind:
Crosswind MT (na).png
 
Last edited:

ericbphoto

Overlander in development
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Feb 7, 2016
Messages
15,213
Reaction score
16,346
Points
113
Age
59
Location
Wellford, SC
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3.0L
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6"
Tire Size
35"
My credo
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are different.
When you make a symmetric tire you have to make two mold halves different so it doubles the work of mold-making
In today’s age of CNC machining, I doubt that that’s an issue. They draw it on the computer and the machine carves the shape. Takes just as long to carve each section of the mold whether it’s mirrored, symmetrical, asymmetrical, etc. the molds are generally made of a whole bunch of segments with 2 side pieces for the side walls. Not normally a 2-half kind of assembly.

The mold segments close and are clamped around the raw tire carcass. Then a bladder inflates with steam/hot water on the inside to push and expand the carcass into the mold pieces. It stays that way for a predetermined period of time. Then the bladder empties, the mold segments open and the hot tire is removed and sent to a cooling room.

(I worked in a Michelin plant for 7 years)
4AE38D26-54D8-46CD-A764-AF43C49DB596.jpeg
 
Last edited:

James Morse

1997 XLT 4.0L 4x4 1999 Mazda B3000 2wd
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2021
Messages
1,891
Reaction score
973
Points
113
Location
Roanoke VA
Vehicle Year
1997 and 1999
Make / Model
XLT 4x4 & B3000
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0L in XLT, 3.0L in B3000
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31x10.5-15 K02's on the Ranger, 235/75R15 on Mazda
My credo
The perfect is the enemy of the good.
Awesome to see the mold and the explanation.
Blows my theory right out of the water. But is it possible it's a holdover from earlier days when they had to carve them by hand and now it's just tradition? I just can't for the life of me figure why it would be the norm that the pattern is mirrored, but flipped, for the two sides of tires? It's almost always done that way, so it's either tradition or there has to be a reason for it.....
 

James Morse

1997 XLT 4.0L 4x4 1999 Mazda B3000 2wd
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2021
Messages
1,891
Reaction score
973
Points
113
Location
Roanoke VA
Vehicle Year
1997 and 1999
Make / Model
XLT 4x4 & B3000
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0L in XLT, 3.0L in B3000
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31x10.5-15 K02's on the Ranger, 235/75R15 on Mazda
My credo
The perfect is the enemy of the good.

Chapap

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2021
Messages
1,055
Reaction score
672
Points
113
Location
NW Florida
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford Ranger XLT
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Drop
1.5” till I get these springs replaced
Tire Size
225-70-R14
Awesome to see the mold and the explanation.
Blows my theory right out of the water. But is it possible it's a holdover from earlier days when they had to carve them by hand and now it's just tradition? I just can't for the life of me figure why it would be the norm that the pattern is mirrored, but flipped, for the two sides of tires? It's almost always done that way, so it's either tradition or there has to be a reason for it.....
Maybe same reason... easier to make the mold/template things? Only need to design half of a tire mold mold, make two mold molds to make the mold.
 

ericbphoto

Overlander in development
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Feb 7, 2016
Messages
15,213
Reaction score
16,346
Points
113
Age
59
Location
Wellford, SC
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3.0L
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6"
Tire Size
35"
My credo
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are different.
Awesome to see the mold and the explanation.
Blows my theory right out of the water. But is it possible it's a holdover from earlier days when they had to carve them by hand and now it's just tradition? I just can't for the life of me figure why it would be the norm that the pattern is mirrored, but flipped, for the two sides of tires? It's almost always done that way, so it's either tradition or there has to be a reason for it.....
You’d really have to ask a tire design engineer for that. There’s a lot more to tire design than most of us know about. All the different rubber compounds for different layers in the tire or different regions of the tire, thicknesses of different portions of the tire, type of material, thickness, etc. for soft cords, design of the metal reinforcing for the bead, type of steel, wire diameter, width, bias angles, etc. for steel belts, extra cordage to counteract g-forces in high speed rated tires, tread design, chemicals added to increase or decrease electrical conductivity to prevent the vehicle from building excessive static charge, etc. Many tires are initially designed for a specific vehicle, based on the vehicle manufacturer’s specifications. They may fit and work well on other vehicles. But began their life for a specific vehicle or class of vehicles.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Kirby N.
March Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top