• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

Geezers: New cars then vs now


G8orFord

Well-Known Member
RBV's on Boost
Joined
Mar 31, 2019
Messages
814
Reaction score
803
Points
93
Location
FL
Vehicle Year
2001
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC S/C
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
0
Total Drop
0
Tire Size
Just the right size to touch the ground.
Y'all do realize one of the biggest reasons 60's & 70's cars didn't seem to last a long as newer vehicles is the overdrive transmissions that weren't available back then, right?

There's only so many revolutions in any internal combustion engine before failure. Reducing that number by nearly 33% makes 'em last a bit longer. Reducing the rpm at cruising speed also adds life. Of course we do have better alloys and lubricants along with other advances, but the overdrive transmission is the major reason in my opinion.

FWIW, I'll take a post 2000 car/truck any day over an older one for everyday use. I like "most" of the newer electronic capabilities. Love cruise control. Not a huge fan of lane keep assist, but lane departure warning I have no problem with.

I'm not saying I don't like older muscle cars or 1978 F-150's, etc., but as a daily, I'd rather have the modern conveniences.
 


racsan

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 17, 2007
Messages
4,919
Reaction score
4,317
Points
113
Location
central ohio
Vehicle Year
2009
Make / Model
ford/escape
Engine Type
2.5 (4 Cylinder)
Engine Size
2.5/151 I-4
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Tire Size
235/70/16
My credo
the grey-t escape
I was a real leadfoot when I started driving in ‘86. No matter what I was in, it was to the floor. Before my first car I was driving dads ‘74 2wd F250 (300/creeper 1st 4 speed, 3.73’s) needless to say it was good for about 70 mph, just wouldnt go any faster. My first car was a ‘79 amc concord with a 232 I-6, auto & idk what rear gears. 80 downhill on a good day at best. I prefer the styling of the older stuff (just look at what I did with my ‘94 ranger) Im not a fan of all the new bells & whistles, I hate the knob for a gearshift everyone seems to be going to. My better half (whos 3 years older than me) actually loves all the technology crap and would love a new car with all that. Our “newest” car is a 2011 escape awd V6. I do like it but Id prefer a 78/79 bronco myself. I am considering a new maverick, It would be “her” commuter, and Id drive it on weekends. (kind of how the escape is now) My job is too dirty for a nice car, Lately Ive been driving the ‘06 HHR just because it gets better fuel milage than my ranger, usually the HHR is my winter beater, and the ranger is kept out of the salt and only daily driven during the non-salted highway months. My favorite vehicle Ive ever owned was my green 93 4.0 4wd supercab ranger. Had that truck over 10 years, (would do 90 btw, handling is awful at that speed, dont recommend) lol. The one I hated the most?- ‘85 jeep CJ7. cold in winter, horrible milage, noisy inside and always needed something. It was a unreliable money pit, was nice in the summer with the hardtop off.
 

rumblecloud

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2020
Messages
1,385
Reaction score
1,106
Points
113
Location
48022
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ranger Splash
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
1-1/2 inch front leveling
Total Drop
Stock
Tire Size
31/10.50/15
My credo
What's the worst that could happen?
Growing up in the 60s, I was too young to drive, but my dad had a thing for hot cars - 57 Studebaker Hawk. My favorite was a 63 Impala SS 409 black convertible - dual quads, four speed, bench seat gorgeous car. Then a 66 Chevelle SS 396.

My first hot raod was a 65 burgundy GTO, trips, white interior with a "reverb" unit - factory.
God I miss those days.
 

bilbo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2016
Messages
786
Reaction score
913
Points
93
Location
South Florida
Vehicle Year
1983
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Engine Size
2.3L
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
0
Total Drop
0
i grew up on carbs and stuff like that and i graduated high school in 94. first car was a 76 buick regal with a v6. great car but somehow a hole rusted through the side of the block after i had it about 3 months. and we lived up in east texas near a lake so the previous owners must have been really running bad water through it.

second car was a 79 honda accord with the cvcc engine and a five speed. that was an awesome car, cruise control, ac, sunroof, everything you could want to feel fancy back in 92/93ish. but the car had a three barrel carb that started flooding out and it turned out the brass floats had holes in them. it cost as much to fix the carb as it did to replace the car so i got rid if it. it was a fun car for high school though

would i want some of the older cars i had, now? i would want my 65 mustang and my 70 karmann ghia. not because they were safe or reliable ( i replaced the ghia engine three times in two years) but because they were just fun cars to me. i know, realistically, they would both probably suck to have now because they had nothing but engines and transmissions. no power steering, no power brakes, no ac, barely had radios.

i would love to have my 85 f150 extended cab. it would still be a useful comfortable truck because it was a lariat so it had velour interior, power everything, and deal tanks.

another fun car that my wife hated so we didn't have it long was a geo metro hatch back with the 3 cylinder motor. it got 55mpg on the highway and the five speed made it a blast to drive. you would rev it to something like 9 or 10k. it had ac and radio but that was it.

i have a new truck and it snice but i am not looking forward to when the warranty goes out and i have to work on it. its a 2017 nissan titan and is only missing the sunroof and locking rear end. its got everything else. its a nice truck but i drive the ranger way more because the ranger is a great size for the city
I had a 97 Metro. Unfortunately it was the auto. They added a cylinder to compensate but it wasn’t enough, it was pretty unremarkable. I remember having to shut the ac off if I had to go uphill to get on the freeway, especially when I had passengers. That said it did get good fuel economy and I’d love to have it back these days. Back when I was young and thought I was the smartest guy in the world I sold it to get a clapped out S10 Blazer.
 

sgtsandman

Aircraft Fuel Tank Diver
TRS Forum Moderator
U.S. Military - Active
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Ham Radio Operator
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Mar 11, 2017
Messages
12,695
Reaction score
12,388
Points
113
Location
Aliquippa, PA
Vehicle Year
2011/2019
Make / Model
Ranger XLT/FX4
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC/2.3 Ecoboost
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
Pre-2008 lift/Stock
Tire Size
31X10.5R15/265/65R17
There are some things better about older vehicles compared to new ones and vice versa.

Older vehicles were certainly simpler in a lot of ways and most things were designed and built to be worked on without a bunch of special tools and equipment.

Conversely, corrosion resistance and lubrication/lubrication systems have improved greatly. I won’t say that 10,000 mile oil change intervals or 100,000 transmission fluid change intervals are necessarily a great thing but it is nice that you don’t have to do preventive maintenance every time you turn around like one was recommended to with older vehicles. Especially things from say the mid 70’s and back.

One thing I definitely don’t like is all the integrated electronics that cost at least $1,000 if something breaks. I’m sure it’s cheaper for the manufacturer to make them like that than separate, replaceable modules.

I’m happy with the level the 2011 is at with electronics to the most part. The 2019 is too much and I didn’t even get all the bells and whistles. So much so that if I buy another vehicle in the future, it’s going to be an older, used one without all the integrated junk.
 

Eddo Rogue

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 18, 2020
Messages
3,952
Reaction score
2,472
Points
113
Location
Burbank,CA
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ranger 4x4
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
OHV
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
skyjacker front leveling kit
Tire Size
31-10.50R15
My credo
Crossed threads are tight threads.
In CA everything made after 1974 needs a SMOG check. Diesels were exempt too. For V8 swaps and whatnot, we would buy pre'74. A lot of guys would buy the diesel Chevy Blazers and swap big blocks in em.
 

sgtsandman

Aircraft Fuel Tank Diver
TRS Forum Moderator
U.S. Military - Active
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Ham Radio Operator
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Mar 11, 2017
Messages
12,695
Reaction score
12,388
Points
113
Location
Aliquippa, PA
Vehicle Year
2011/2019
Make / Model
Ranger XLT/FX4
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC/2.3 Ecoboost
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
Pre-2008 lift/Stock
Tire Size
31X10.5R15/265/65R17
I’m not sure what the cut off here is since everything I’ve had was from 1979 and up but every vehicle I’ve owned has had to get emissions testing every year. Now if I lived one more county north of here or south of Allegheny county, I wouldn’t have to get emissions testing. Just the annual safety inspection.
 

Chapap

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2021
Messages
1,055
Reaction score
672
Points
113
Location
NW Florida
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford Ranger XLT
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Drop
1.5” till I get these springs replaced
Tire Size
225-70-R14
I’m not sure what the cut off here is since everything I’ve had was from 1979 and up but every vehicle I’ve owned has had to get emissions testing every year. Now if I lived one more county north of here or south of Allegheny county, I wouldn’t have to get emissions testing. Just the annual safety inspection.
That’s why I like Florida. When you register a vehicle, they check the vin. They never look at the vehicle again. They’ve never even looked at any trailers I’ve registered.
 

oldgeek

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2022
Messages
819
Reaction score
1,027
Points
93
Location
USA
Vehicle Year
94
Make / Model
Ranger XLT
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Many moons ago, in Kansas (I think), there would be an 'inspection' by a trooper when one would get their car registered. One of the requirements was that the vehicle have windshield wipers. However, there wasn't a requirement for an actual windshield.
 

superj

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Oct 1, 2021
Messages
3,029
Reaction score
2,501
Points
113
Location
corpus christi, texas
Vehicle Year
2004
Make / Model
ranger edge
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3 liters of tire smoking power
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
none
Total Drop
none
Tire Size
235s
My credo
Grew up in the 70s, 80s, and 90s
that is actually how lots of safety inspections are in states. requires wipers but no actually windows.

and the catalytic convert requirement is federal from 74, if i remember right. it applies to all states but a bunch don't look at that stuff. they look where i live but that's the extent, look to see if one is there. no cat, no pass. cat look-a-like present, good to go
 

Eddo Rogue

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 18, 2020
Messages
3,952
Reaction score
2,472
Points
113
Location
Burbank,CA
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ranger 4x4
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
OHV
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
skyjacker front leveling kit
Tire Size
31-10.50R15
My credo
Crossed threads are tight threads.
That’s why I like Florida. When you register a vehicle, they check the vin. They never look at the vehicle again. They’ve never even looked at any trailers I’ve registered.
Wow. Here we gotta renew tags every year. It's anywhere from less than $100 to $500+ depending on how fancy/new your vehicle is.
 

Eddo Rogue

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 18, 2020
Messages
3,952
Reaction score
2,472
Points
113
Location
Burbank,CA
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ranger 4x4
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
OHV
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
skyjacker front leveling kit
Tire Size
31-10.50R15
My credo
Crossed threads are tight threads.
that is actually how lots of safety inspections are in states. requires wipers but no actually windows.

and the catalytic convert requirement is federal from 74, if i remember right. it applies to all states but a bunch don't look at that stuff. they look where i live but that's the extent, look to see if one is there. no cat, no pass. cat look-a-like present, good to go
Here all they care about is the emissions. Nothing cosmetic or otherwise functional matters. It's quite flawed. The CEL is the only dash light that matter.
 

racsan

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 17, 2007
Messages
4,919
Reaction score
4,317
Points
113
Location
central ohio
Vehicle Year
2009
Make / Model
ford/escape
Engine Type
2.5 (4 Cylinder)
Engine Size
2.5/151 I-4
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Tire Size
235/70/16
My credo
the grey-t escape
glad we dont have that crap in ohio with inspections or emissions. (at least not where Im at) VIN? no ine ever looks at those. licence renewal is yearly but you can get multiple years at once, The biggest ouch Ive seen is (1) hybrid/electric get a high surcharge each year (200/300?) and any truck over 3/4 ton is a commercial tag. If I had the want/need for a dually I would just get a 3/4 ton & roll a dually axle under the butt and slap a dually bed on.
 

scotts90ranger

Well-Known Member
RBV's on Boost
Joined
Feb 28, 2001
Messages
7,929
Reaction score
4,227
Points
113
Location
Dayton Oregon
Vehicle Year
1990, 1997
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Engine Size
2.3 Turbo
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6
Tire Size
35"
I don't want all the fancy dodads, some would be nice but reliability and fuel mileage were key, plus I wanted TIB front suspension and leg room so that narrowed down the search for my current '97 Ranger daily driver... it fits the bill, power windows and cruise control would be nice but not the most used since there's too much shifting with the 2.3L and manal... I used cruise control on my manual trans diesel F350 all the time when the speedo works, it has torque to pull through stuff...

I just can't take the price of new stuff, I don't like payments and around here older vehicles last just fine so I have choices... my '97 Ranger has almost no rust (absolutely no rust compared to any pics I've seen of rust belt rigs...). With older stuff you get breaks for stuff, all my stuff is labeled as less than 19mpg for registration purposes which is the cheapest since it's all old, we get 2 year tags on older stuff, new cars can get 4 year tags. No inspections unless you are transferring a vehicle from out of state then you get to go to the DMV and get a $30 VIN check. Only a handful of counties in Oregon have emissions but it's pretty simple, just a OBD II scan if equipped or a tailpipe sniff if not equipped...

I wouldn't mind some gizmos but everything is to the point of dumb anymore, give me power windows, cruise control, power locks, reasonable stereo (with bluetooth and such, no satalite radio or 87" screen), a climate control with A/C, a hot/cold slider with zone slider and a fan knob and knock it off with this thermostat junk, rubber floor, bucket seats... I like manual transmissions but more modern transmissions are more efficient than the '90's stuff...
 

Chapap

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2021
Messages
1,055
Reaction score
672
Points
113
Location
NW Florida
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford Ranger XLT
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Drop
1.5” till I get these springs replaced
Tire Size
225-70-R14
I don't want all the fancy dodads, some would be nice but reliability and fuel mileage were key, plus I wanted TIB front suspension and leg room so that narrowed down the search for my current '97 Ranger daily driver... it fits the bill, power windows and cruise control would be nice but not the most used since there's too much shifting with the 2.3L and manal... I used cruise control on my manual trans diesel F350 all the time when the speedo works, it has torque to pull through stuff...

I just can't take the price of new stuff, I don't like payments and around here older vehicles last just fine so I have choices... my '97 Ranger has almost no rust (absolutely no rust compared to any pics I've seen of rust belt rigs...). With older stuff you get breaks for stuff, all my stuff is labeled as less than 19mpg for registration purposes which is the cheapest since it's all old, we get 2 year tags on older stuff, new cars can get 4 year tags. No inspections unless you are transferring a vehicle from out of state then you get to go to the DMV and get a $30 VIN check. Only a handful of counties in Oregon have emissions but it's pretty simple, just a OBD II scan if equipped or a tailpipe sniff if not equipped...

I wouldn't mind some gizmos but everything is to the point of dumb anymore, give me power windows, cruise control, power locks, reasonable stereo (with bluetooth and such, no satalite radio or 87" screen), a climate control with A/C, a hot/cold slider with zone slider and a fan knob and knock it off with this thermostat junk, rubber floor, bucket seats... I like manual transmissions but more modern transmissions are more efficient than the '90's stuff...
Wait… hybrids and electric cost more? Low mpg cost less? What’s the idea behind that?
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Kirby N.
March Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top