| Home | Forums | Info - Technical | Info - Other | TRS News | Photo Galleries | Shirts & Decals | Parts Store | Classifieds |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Year: 1988
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 1993 5.0L EFI
Class: 2wd
Used For: Dailly driver and track terror on weekends
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 7 ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
The L&L headers are similar in design to the Advance Adapter header, long tube on passenger and moderate length on drivers side, I prefer the long tube design on the patriot for torque, also installing mechanical dump valves, is easier to locate and operate with long tube headers in my opinion.
__________________
Details of this build can be found here: |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North of Boston
Year: 2003
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger Edge
Engine: 3.0
Class: 4x4
Used For: DD
Posts: 653
Rep Power: 10 ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
Quote:
Not a piece of pipe with pice welded on. http://landlproducts.com/list.aspx?cID=2 Chk them out there is a nice kit for the 97 down, not sure if they will fit my 03 but I would like to know. I did ask them and they said yes they will fit all 5.0s in 83 to present but the frame chg’d in 98 so not sure where this will go. I hope they do fit.
__________________
Do It Right The First Time ! Scrambler82 N1MAU/W1IO |
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Year: 1988
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 1993 5.0L EFI
Class: 2wd
Used For: Dailly driver and track terror on weekends
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 7 ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
Here are some pic of the Advance Adapter Header and the L&L header previously mentioned:
Really the only dif I can see is one is a flanged header collector and the other is a slip fit in design and one set dumps to the front on drivers side, suppose that is better for 4x4 setup, I do really like the big tube primary on these headers and thicker header flanges, makes it easier to control a leak, more plate there in case you need them surfaced, but with the thinner flange like on the Patriot I will just cut the flange between exhaust posts, this allows a better seal as there is no strain between ports on the flange, problem for me is with the AA and L&L headers they don't mention fitment using an AOD trans in their descriptions (at least I didn't see anything when I was reading the application notes) and unless you running a forced induction system (Blower, turbo or a power adder like NOS or Methinol fogger also know as snow) the larger primary tubes will hurt by slowing exhaust gas flow witch in turn will reduce torque at lower RPM's but will help at higher RPM's where these little motors make their best hp, just depends where you want it, as for fit up I am sure they work fine with C4 or std with small bell housing. If using a set of mechanical dump valves it would be difficult to set-up with this configuration. The AD headers go for about $275.00 and the L&L are around $500.00 before shipping (PRICES ARE FROM THEIR MANUFACTURER'S SITES AND MAY VARY FROM SITE TO SITE). I paid $223.00 delivered to Canada for the Patriot Tri-y headers, if they don't work out power wise I will upgrade to something better in future but for now they suit my purpose and pocketbook. With some slight mods to my Ti-y headers they fit great and I can remove them from inside the engine bay. Here are some links to the Advanced Adapter and L&L headers for you to view http://www.advanceadapters.com/products/pn-717044a/ http://landlproducts.com/details.asp...06&ItemID=1083 Here is a good shot of the Patriot Tri-y headers installed on a Ford Ranger V8 windsor conversion with a std and small bell housing where no mods were required to the headers, the builder took this pic with cab removed, great shot thanks, I forget which thread I got this from and sorry for not giving credit to actual owner if you see this pic and it's yours, first off thanks for posting it and please speak up so I can attach your name and a link to the picture for the original thread I got it from.
__________________
Details of this build can be found here: Last edited by jfl1960; 02-21-2012 at 09:48 AM. |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North of Boston
Year: 2003
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger Edge
Engine: 3.0
Class: 4x4
Used For: DD
Posts: 653
Rep Power: 10 ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
Quote:
I thought AA still used the ones that looked like a piece of pipe with smaller pipes coming out to attach to the exh ports. Sorry about that I should have looked it up. added: I used the L&L Headers/Conversion Kit on my ’88 Ranger/5.0L conversion, it was easy and everything fell into place. I now want to do an 03 4x4 Conversion but from everything I have seen so far Torque Monster headers are the only thing out there and they cost $750 +. Not sure where to go. but really want to get tubular type header that fit the rails with out a lot of trimming. Sorry for the Hy-Jack.
__________________
Do It Right The First Time ! Scrambler82 N1MAU/W1IO Last edited by Scrambler82; 02-21-2012 at 11:13 AM. |
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Opelousas La.
Year: 1989
Make: Ranger
Model: Supercab
Posts: 2,547
Rep Power: 18 ![]() ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
The difference in the pics posted above of the L&L and AA headers is the routing of the passenger side header. The drivers sides are almost mirror images of each other, not sure how the AA would clear the sterring box.. The AA header drops down below the starter, possibly coming into contact with the larger bellhousings, the L&L dumps above the starter, much like the Hedman 88400's do, but in a longer length header. The L&L would have a better chance of fitting a larger bell and should clear the frame better, not to mention not subjecting the starter to it's heat.
Last edited by baddad457; 02-21-2012 at 11:09 AM. |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Opelousas La.
Year: 1989
Make: Ranger
Model: Supercab
Posts: 2,547
Rep Power: 18 ![]() ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
I went back and looked at the AA headers on Ebay, there's something screwy here. The pics above posted by jfl1960 are different than the ones on ebay. The driver's side appears to be reversed to each other.
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#31 |
|
TOTM Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Medina, Ohio
Year: 1992,1994,1995
Make: Ford,Ford,Jeep
Model: Ranger,Ranger,ZJ
Engine: 4.0l,3.0l (soon to be 302),5.2l
Class: 2wd Street
Used For: learning experiAnce, daily
Posts: 2,988
Rep Power: 10 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: (1)
|
Do tri-ys hang below the frame? I plan on doing a v8 swap in my bagged 94 and havent decided on headers. Im also running an aod, is there any problems there?
Edit: nevermind found more info by looking at all of the pages in this thread. Im looking at this on my phone lol. The tri-ys are for a mustang correct?
__________________
My build thread Cardomain '92 Ranger X-cab 4.0l '94 Ranger long bed 3.0l, bagged and chopped '95 Jeep Grand Cherokee 5.2l, wheeler someday '13 F-150 Ecoboost 4x4 daily driver www.lhinteriorsllc.com Last edited by ZMan; 02-21-2012 at 11:30 AM. |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Between Omaha & Des Moines
Year: 1985
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 5.0
Class: 4x4
Used For: A weapon of massive consumption.
Posts: 11,186
Rep Power: 51 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
One thing I do like about the PS L&L's vs the 88400's is that it kicks it down rather than point it right at the firewall (if you don't have a bodylift)
I also like how #7 of both sets is to the outside on the DS vs the 88400's, so when you run a block mounted dipstick it isn't pinched between the header and cylinder head. That is probably my biggest beef with the 88400's in my truck. ![]() Pics in post #12 of this thread. For a 2wd they are what I would go with, they do take a little work to clear 164T bellhousings as noted later in this thread.
__________________
1985 Ford Ranger Custom, 4x4, PA 3" BL, 5.0 HO wannabe, C5 Transmixer, 31 spline T/L 8.8 w/ disc brakes. Build Thread My Ranger is not old; no one would call her old. She has a bluff bow, lovely lines. She's a fine truck: weatherly, stiff and fast... very fast, if she's well handled. No, she's not old; she's in her prime. Last edited by 85_Ranger4x4; 02-21-2012 at 11:30 AM. |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Opelousas La.
Year: 1989
Make: Ranger
Model: Supercab
Posts: 2,547
Rep Power: 18 ![]() ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
The Tri-Y's we're discussing were originally intended to fit the 65-66 Mustangs. There are/can be minor differences among the dozen or so mfgs of these, so be forewarned, how one set fits may not be the case with another set. This can also be the case with engine swaps, no two are ever exactly alike. Be prepared to make changes no matter what or whose headers you choose.
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: McMinnville, OR
Year: 1991
Make: Ranger
Model: Supercab 4x2
Engine: 3.0
Class: 2wd Street
Used For: Commute
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 5 ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
These are slightly different, 67-70, but any real chance they would clear everything?
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/PTE-H8426/ |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Year: 1988
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 1993 5.0L EFI
Class: 2wd
Used For: Dailly driver and track terror on weekends
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 7 ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
Quote:
__________________
Details of this build can be found here: |
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Year: 1988
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 1993 5.0L EFI
Class: 2wd
Used For: Dailly driver and track terror on weekends
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 7 ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
Quote:
__________________
Details of this build can be found here: |
|
|
|
Tweet
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|