Serving Ford Ranger, Bronco II, Explorer & Mazda B-Series Owners Since 1999

 
 
Home Forums Info - Technical Info - Other TRS News Photo Galleries Shirts & Decals Parts Store Classifieds

 

Go Back   The Ranger Station Forums > Engine & Transmission Forums > Engine Conversions > 'Other' Engine Conversions

Notices

'Other' Engine Conversions All other engine swaps. Not for discussing V-8 swaps

Post New Thread Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-08-2009, 10:19 AM   #1
Southern_Trendkill
Member
 
Southern_Trendkill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Year: 1961, 2010
Make: Mercury, Mitsub
Model: Comet, Lancer
Engine: 144 "Thriftpower", 2.4 MIVEC
Used For: Daily Driver

Posts: 850
Rep Power: 10
Southern_Trendkill will become famous soon enough
iTrader: (0)
Default Duratec 35

Has anyone ever tried to put one of these into a ranger?
__________________
Proud Member of the American Libertarian Party

Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay FX4 View Post
I'd eat it.
Southern_Trendkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 02:06 PM   #2
Wicked_Sludge
Member
 
Wicked_Sludge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Westport, WA

Year: 1993
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger, Flareside
Engine: 3-point-GO
Class: 4x4
Used For: Attracting the ladies

Posts: 6,938
Rep Power: 25
Wicked_Sludge will become famous soon enough
iTrader: (0)
Send a message via MSN to Wicked_Sludge
Default

not that ive heard of.

the duratec engine family is supposed to share a common bellhousing bolt pattern. if thats the case, the 3.5 should bolt right to a 2.3 duratec transmission. of coarse this means no 4wd unless you tear the 2.3 trans apart to convert it.

the intake appears to by symmetrical, so it could probably be flipped. coolant lines would have to be rerouted, motor mounts fabbed, wiring harnesses modified, and exhaust work done.
__________________
As seen on the internets!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hahnsb2 View Post
Dyno sheet or GTFO
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ranger Dave (B25) View Post
The call was for scantily-clad women. A Certificate of Boob Authenticity was NOT specified.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grant Imahara
I'm not sure if we have the right stuff; I'm just hoping we don't have the wrong stuff.
__________________________________________________ ____________________________________
Last edited by Wicked_Sludge : Today at 09:16 PM.
Wicked_Sludge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 01:26 PM   #3
Sevensecondsuv
Member
 
Sevensecondsuv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rockford, IL

Year: 1989,1990,1992
Make: Ford
Model: F150, Ranger, Explorer
Engine: 4.9L,2.3T,4.0L
Class: 2wd,2wd,4x4
Used For: Towing, Speeding, DD/4x4ing

Posts: 1,123
Rep Power: 14
Sevensecondsuv is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (1)
Default

Dont 3.5's have the same bolt pattern as the 3.0 DOHC duratechs, which have the same bolt patterns as the vulcan 3.0 used in rangers that you could get a trans from? Or do I have my bolt patters confused?
__________________
2011 Ford Ranger XLT Ext Cab 2.3L 5-spd - DD
1992 Explorer Sport 4wd 5-spd
1995 Ford F-150 Custom 4wd 4.9L ZF5 coming soon!
2005 Lincoln LS 3.0L V6 - Wife's
Past: 1990 Ranger 2wd 2.3L Turbo
Sevensecondsuv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 04:10 PM   #4
rurouni20xx
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: natchitoches, la

Year: 1993
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger XLT
Engine: 3.0L V6
Class: 4X4
Used For: Everything

Posts: 1,176
Rep Power: 11
rurouni20xx is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (2)
Send a message via Yahoo to rurouni20xx
Default

3.0 vulcan, 3.0 dohc (taurus sho) and fwd only 3.8s share a bolt pattern, duratec 30 and 35s are the same if im not mistaken, but you cant just bolt it to a vulcan engine or tranny (i wish you could...)
rurouni20xx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 06:02 PM   #5
Roadkill
Member
 
Roadkill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada

Year: 2002
Make: Ford
Model: F-350 SC Lariat
Engine: 7.3l turbo
Class: 4x4
Used For: Everything

Posts: 537
Rep Power: 13
Roadkill is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Default

I'm not so sure on the 3.0 Vulcan and 3.0 Mitsubishi motors having the same bolt pattern. It was my understanding that the Vulcan (was also in the non-SHO Taurus cars) is it's own unique pattern. None of the Duratech engines will match a Vulcan pattern for sure.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------
If you have 'it', thank a trucker!
"Silencers do not make a sniper silent, they make them invisible." Finnish saying
------------------------------------------------------
OF4WD member ID #3275
2003 Explorer Limited
Roadkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 06:23 PM   #6
rurouni20xx
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: natchitoches, la

Year: 1993
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger XLT
Engine: 3.0L V6
Class: 4X4
Used For: Everything

Posts: 1,176
Rep Power: 11
rurouni20xx is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (2)
Send a message via Yahoo to rurouni20xx
Default

the taurus sho was a yamaha-ford vulcan project, yamaha made the heads and cam assy that fit on vulcan 3.0 internals. what does mitsu have to do w/ any of this you have piqued my curiosity here. i know they had the tranny line b4 mazda did, thats about all i know.
rurouni20xx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 06:27 PM   #7
Roadkill
Member
 
Roadkill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada

Year: 2002
Make: Ford
Model: F-350 SC Lariat
Engine: 7.3l turbo
Class: 4x4
Used For: Everything

Posts: 537
Rep Power: 13
Roadkill is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Default

Sorry, I knew it was an import company that made the SHO engine. Couldn't quite remember the exact one. I had always heard that the Yamaha SHO engine was it's own beast not similar to any other Ford engine.

If it is indeed a Vulcan block then that makes some swaps much easier. As long as you weld the cams on the SHO engine before the gears spin and blow up things.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------
If you have 'it', thank a trucker!
"Silencers do not make a sniper silent, they make them invisible." Finnish saying
------------------------------------------------------
OF4WD member ID #3275
2003 Explorer Limited
Roadkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 06:59 PM   #8
99RangerBoss
Member
 
99RangerBoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Weinerpeg

Year: 2003
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger edge 2wd
Engine: 3.0
Class: 2WD Off-road
Used For: drifting, racing ricers, etc...

Posts: 303
Rep Power: 11
99RangerBoss is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Default

hey so does the sho motor share the same internals as the vulvan like the pistons connecting rods and crank?
99RangerBoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 09:27 PM   #9
rurouni20xx
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: natchitoches, la

Year: 1993
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger XLT
Engine: 3.0L V6
Class: 4X4
Used For: Everything

Posts: 1,176
Rep Power: 11
rurouni20xx is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (2)
Send a message via Yahoo to rurouni20xx
Default

not sure i would imagine the the pistons are dif tho cuz they have to be milled out for 4 valves instead of just two. the rods etc im unsure about but i would imagine they are similar. the crank will be dif since it has to run the timing system on the heads, and the block will be dif since the cams are in the heads rather than above the crank w/ the usual lifter setup. i know they share a common bolt pattern, i havent seen the engine but i know how dohc 24 valve v6s are setup. when i was considering my options i wouldnt have minded doing a 3.3 stroker sho motor and then boosting it but the crank and internals are dif so i just opted to redo my existing motor. a boosted 3.0 sho swap would b kewl but i already have my motor, and i dont know where a 3.0 sho motor is. easier on me this way than trying to find a motor then working on it. ive looked up the specs but unless i physically tear it down and compare parts i cant tell you if the rods are the same and the block etc. best as i can tell the dohc sho engine is derived from the vulcan ohv engine.
rurouni20xx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 09:43 PM   #10
99RangerBoss
Member
 
99RangerBoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Weinerpeg

Year: 2003
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger edge 2wd
Engine: 3.0
Class: 2WD Off-road
Used For: drifting, racing ricers, etc...

Posts: 303
Rep Power: 11
99RangerBoss is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Default

i was thinking if the internals were the same it could be swappable to the ohv block but like you said the valve releifs would screw it up i guess the only way to get a stronger motor would be the morana kit or flatlander racings one
99RangerBoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2009, 01:45 PM   #11
rurouni20xx
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: natchitoches, la

Year: 1993
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger XLT
Engine: 3.0L V6
Class: 4X4
Used For: Everything

Posts: 1,176
Rep Power: 11
rurouni20xx is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (2)
Send a message via Yahoo to rurouni20xx
Default

flatlander racing? im going to build a morana 3.3 turbo, ive never heard of flatlander racing.
rurouni20xx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2009, 10:47 PM   #12
Wicked_Sludge
Member
 
Wicked_Sludge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Westport, WA

Year: 1993
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger, Flareside
Engine: 3-point-GO
Class: 4x4
Used For: Attracting the ladies

Posts: 6,938
Rep Power: 25
Wicked_Sludge will become famous soon enough
iTrader: (0)
Send a message via MSN to Wicked_Sludge
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rurouni20xx View Post
the taurus sho was a yamaha-ford vulcan project, yamaha made the heads and cam assy that fit on vulcan 3.0 internals.
the 3.0/3.2 SHO used in the '89-94 tauri are all yamaha. ford ORIGINALLY wanted yamaha to use the vulcan block but yamaha took one look at it and said "ya right". so the SHO block is its own unit. the only common thing between the SHO and vulcan is the bellhousing bolt pattern.

SHO internals have been made to fit the vulcan, but it takes excessive machine work on the crank/mains. its anything but bolt-in.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadkill View Post
As long as you weld the cams on the SHO engine before the gears spin and blow up things.
thats the v-8 SHO used in the '95 and up taurus'. the 3.0/3.2 SHO does not suffer from this problem (and its non-interference, unlike the v-8). the v-8 IS a ford/yamaha hybrid, using a duratec block with yamaha heads/guts.

the 3.0 vulcan, DOHC 3.0/3.2 SHO, FWD 3.8 block, and 2.3 HSC used in the tempo (NOT related to the 2.3 lima used in rangers/mustangs/t-brids/etc) all share a bellhousing bolt pattern.

the 3.5 duratec, 3.0 duratec, 3.4 SHO, 2.3 duratec...and on down the line.. should all use one bellhousing bolt pattern.
__________________
As seen on the internets!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hahnsb2 View Post
Dyno sheet or GTFO
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ranger Dave (B25) View Post
The call was for scantily-clad women. A Certificate of Boob Authenticity was NOT specified.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grant Imahara
I'm not sure if we have the right stuff; I'm just hoping we don't have the wrong stuff.
__________________________________________________ ____________________________________
Last edited by Wicked_Sludge : Today at 09:16 PM.

Last edited by Wicked_Sludge; 02-17-2009 at 10:49 PM.
Wicked_Sludge is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:55 AM.


© 1999-2012 / 959 Media LLC / All Rights Reserved

The Ranger Station is in no way affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.

[Legal Notices]   [Advertising/Vendors]
 
Also check out SSP Central for Special Service & Non-Traditional Police & Fire Vehicles