Serving Ford Ranger, Bronco II, Explorer & Mazda B-Series Owners Since 1999

 
 
Home Forums Info - Technical Info - Other TRS News Photo Galleries Shirts & Decals Parts Store Classifieds

 

Go Back   The Ranger Station Forums > Suspension & Armor > PreRunners

Notices

PreRunners Dedicated to legendary desert racer and Ranger driver Manny Esquerra.

View Poll Results: What do you think is better for desert racing?
2wd Ranger 133 65.20%
4WD Ranger 71 34.80%
Voters: 204. You may not vote on this poll

Post New Thread Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-01-2008, 10:45 PM   #25
84projectFORD
Member
 
84projectFORD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Year: 1984
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 4.0
Class: 2wd Race
Used For: anger management

Posts: 694
Rep Power: 11
84projectFORD is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Default

ok guys the whole reason we started this forum part was for helpful info and on ideas that people have and would like to try. Every person has their own opinion and is entitled to it but bullshit fighting with eachother is not what we are here for. save it for another place. I might be comin across harsh on this but i dont want this forum to turn inot a dramarangers. there is a reason i like this one so much because there is no of this cussin eachother out and sayin "my opinion is always right and everyone should abide by it".


Anyhow, i prefer 2wd over 4wd due to how cheap it is and how readily avaible parts are. now when your racing long distance, chances are you will prerun the coarse first and find the deep silt beds and bad hill climbs. thats when you find your ways around it or best trail up it.

4wd is a great back up and would be great on a prerunner but for racing application i do not believe it is the best way. should something break, bend or sieze in the front end that part will most likely be more expensive than something on a 2wd and things will break. in all the desert races i have seen and been in though i have yet to see where you have to have 4wd to make it to the finish line. To me a 4wd is just not worth it, its too expensive to buy and to fix nor is it practical in my eyes but there are others out there that think differently. to each his own

Quote:
Originally Posted by ckblum View Post
Actually Trophy Trucks outrun everything else because they have 800+ HP and cycle over 2 feet (sometimes 3) of suspension travel and spend hours tuning shocks with quad bypasses and coil-overs all around. If you spend $700 000+ it's hard not to beat the other classes.

Also most Trophy Trucks are 2wd, I can only think of one that was built 4wd and I can't even remember who built it so chances are it wasn't too significant and probably didn't do well enough to remember lol jk jk.

My vote is on 2wd for racing but since I live in BC I would definately build a 4wd if I could. Funny thing is I am building a 2wd anyways haha.
yes all TT are 2wd drive except for the terrible herbst trophy truck. the problem with 4wd in a TT is the limit to wheel travel and now you are turning more mass which can put more load on all teh drive line parts and cause premature failure. the most the herbst can run is 20" reliably. reg TT's run 27+ up front
__________________
1984 Ranger: rc, lwb, 4.0, M50D, Threat Motorsports 6" over equal lenght beams, swing set steering and dana 44 knuckles, glassed front fenders, Giant 64" rear leafs (21" travel!), 9" soon to be trussed & spooled.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Oaks
Just Because Your 2wd Is Lifted - Doesn't Make It A PreRunner!
84projectFORD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 10:57 PM   #26
Jim Oaks
Building another truck



 
Jim Oaks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Salem, Ohio

Year: 1983 & 1996
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 5.0 / 4.0
Class: 4x4
Used For: Dedicated trail rig!

Posts: 6,052
Rep Power: 10
Jim Oaks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Oaks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Oaks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Oaks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Oaks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Oaks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Oaks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Oaks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Oaks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Oaks has a reputation beyond reputeJim Oaks has a reputation beyond repute
iTrader: (0)
Default

Let's not start with the bickering.

It's just a poll.

I'm sure people have their own reason for choosing 2WD or 4WD.

People can have the same arguements all day long about whether to have a manual or automatic in a trail rig.
__________________
Some people are like slinkies -- not much good for anything, but they bring a smile to your face when pushed down the stairs.


Check out my Blue Oval Militia Profile HERE

Follow Me

Vote For TRS In Top 4x4 Sites
Jim Oaks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 11:00 PM   #27
TayCo 7s
Member
 
TayCo 7s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ensenada, Baja, Mexico!!

Year: 1989
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 4.0
Class: 7 stock
Used For: racing someday

Posts: 165
Rep Power: 12
TayCo 7s is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Send a message via MSN to TayCo 7s
Default

dramarangers... LoL that was a good one
__________________
'89 Ford Ranger Class 7s UnderConstruction . 4.0 SOHC,t5 tranny, f-150 spindles, reinforced ibeams, custom leaf springs made in TEMO spring shop, 4" lift coils.

2002 Ford Ranger 4 banger ! fabtech spindles,bilstein shocks, front and rear fiberglass fenders, flowmaster exhaust, k&n cold air intake, 33x12.50 R15 BFgoodrich tires, tube bumper w/skidplate.
TayCo 7s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 12:08 AM   #28
DirtyBaconRacing
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007


Posts: 5
Rep Power: 0
DirtyBaconRacing is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Default

TT have 800hp, spool, and 26"+ of front travel......the only 4wd TT i can think of is the old Macpherson TT form the late 90s......when u are going 120+, u dont really need 4wd.....and when u get in the sticky stuff, u always got that spool to get u out
DirtyBaconRacing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 12:52 AM   #29
8594
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Underarock

Year: 85 & 94
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 4.0
Class: 4WD Serious
Used For: driving?

Posts: 58
Rep Power: 10
8594 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dave@threat View Post
Who cares really? Run it! You can pay big bucks for a race truck weather its 2 or 4wd but that doesn't mean it comes with talent. If your a good driver you can get though the worst desert with an open diff 2 flats and 5 cylinders.....

No problems here
8594 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 10:33 AM   #30
8594
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Underarock

Year: 85 & 94
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 4.0
Class: 4WD Serious
Used For: driving?

Posts: 58
Rep Power: 10
8594 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dave@threat View Post
You sir have a "4wd for the right task" until you can do it all in a 2wd then your still lacking talent... I'm just messing with ya haha!
True nuff!
I build em for real drivers, and I only think I'm fast... when I'm sleeping!
8594 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 12:24 PM   #31
84projectFORD
Member
 
84projectFORD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Year: 1984
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 4.0
Class: 2wd Race
Used For: anger management

Posts: 694
Rep Power: 11
84projectFORD is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dave@threat View Post
Who cares really? Run it! You can pay big bucks for a race truck weather its 2 or 4wd but that doesn't mean it comes with talent. If your a good driver you can get though the worst desert with an open diff 2 flats and 5 cylinders.....
haha oh thats good stuff! i kinda did something like that. in our race rhino we won the AVi 150 on a broken RR axle, flat LR tire, CVT clutch that was stuck open (no bottom end, all top end), a batt that was dying, 240 degree water temp and the guy behind us was haulin to catch us. we won by 3 min haha.
__________________
1984 Ranger: rc, lwb, 4.0, M50D, Threat Motorsports 6" over equal lenght beams, swing set steering and dana 44 knuckles, glassed front fenders, Giant 64" rear leafs (21" travel!), 9" soon to be trussed & spooled.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Oaks
Just Because Your 2wd Is Lifted - Doesn't Make It A PreRunner!
84projectFORD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2008, 11:11 AM   #32
shaun_kite
Junior Member
 
shaun_kite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Fort Irwin, CA

Year: 1997
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger..what's left of it.
Engine: 5.0 V8
Class: 2wd Off-Road
Used For: Playing in the sand!

Posts: 56
Rep Power: 10
shaun_kite is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to shaun_kite Send a message via Yahoo to shaun_kite
Default

2wd pref. for travel and simplicity. Both platforms are only as good as the driver.
shaun_kite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2009, 03:07 PM   #33
rngrdngr
Member
 
rngrdngr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SO CAL

Year: 1999
Make: FORD
Model: RANGER XLT
Engine: 3.0L
Class: 2WD OFF-ROAD
Used For: NOTHING

Posts: 282
Rep Power: 11
rngrdngr is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Default

2wd for desert racing. 4wd for areana racing. +2 to shaun-kite it depends on how good the driver is. you can have a 800hp 4wd truck with a dude that cant drive and get stuck.
__________________
long-ez, bd-5b,1999 Dodge Ram 1500 4x4, 1999 Ford Ranger xlt(for sale), 1968 amc rebel sst conv.
MY TOYS!!!
rngrdngr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 06:25 PM   #34
odie1969
Member

 
odie1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: tempe Az

Year: 1987
Make: Ford
Model: 87 stx
Engine: 4.0l sohc
Class: 4x4

Posts: 1,271
Rep Power: 14
odie1969 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (2)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8594 View Post
True nuff!
I build em for real drivers, and I only think I'm fast... when I'm sleeping!
So are you saying you are only fast in BED . But I don't know Crap about racing. Maybe one day if I'm lucky I can find a Right Seat in a Ride.
__________________
Plz no grammer NAZIS I know my spelling and grammer sucks. thanks.

2001 ranger 3.0l 2wd posed out with prerunner fronts.
1987 ranger 2.9l 4wd stx (swaping in 4.0l sohc trans and 8.8)
1969 mercury cougar conv. 351w virgin as mary
1964 MG Midget 1275cc motor
1996 mustang Gt conv. 4.6l steeda susp. parts
odie1969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2009, 11:00 PM   #35
84projectFORD
Member
 
84projectFORD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Year: 1984
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 4.0
Class: 2wd Race
Used For: anger management

Posts: 694
Rep Power: 11
84projectFORD is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by odie1969 View Post
So are you saying you are only fast in BED . But I don't know Crap about racing. Maybe one day if I'm lucky I can find a Right Seat in a Ride.
ill let you in my right seat but at a certain price
__________________
1984 Ranger: rc, lwb, 4.0, M50D, Threat Motorsports 6" over equal lenght beams, swing set steering and dana 44 knuckles, glassed front fenders, Giant 64" rear leafs (21" travel!), 9" soon to be trussed & spooled.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Oaks
Just Because Your 2wd Is Lifted - Doesn't Make It A PreRunner!
84projectFORD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2009, 11:49 PM   #36
Frank The Tank
Member
 
Frank The Tank's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Western Kentucky

Year: 98 70
Make: Protege' F100-R
Model: Wrecked but running XLT
Engine: 1. sumthing 7.3 gasoline
Class: 2wd HellRaiser
Used For: Getting to Work, Emptying my Wallet

Posts: 2,825
Rep Power: 17
Frank The Tank is just really niceFrank The Tank is just really niceFrank The Tank is just really niceFrank The Tank is just really nice
iTrader: (0)
Default

IFS has come a long way.... it's quickly becoming the new standard in rock crawling.

I believe you can have a lightweight purpose built 4wd, that will get you off the line, and let you put all the power to the ground in curves, and on the off chance you have to dodge a local and sling out into the sand.

I believe the main thing would be an exact matched front and rear drive ratio to protect the hard parts at high speed (most front ends pull a hair faster than the rear)

Frank

Frank
__________________
When I start my Ranger, babies cry.

I was happy once, smiled, it hurt my face!!!

7.3 liter gasoline. The way FE's were supposed to be.

Quote:
Originally Posted by robertc1024 View Post
Frank, I'm glad you're back. You're like the pepper to the sauce.
Frank The Tank is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 AM.


© 1999-2012 / 959 Media LLC / All Rights Reserved

The Ranger Station is in no way affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.

[Legal Notices]   [Advertising/Vendors]
 
Also check out SSP Central for Special Service & Non-Traditional Police & Fire Vehicles