• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

2.9 vs 4.0


jeffpinto

New Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2015
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Transmission
Automatic
I am almost finished with my 4.0 install, I thought it would be interesting to see the difference between the 2.9 and 4.0. Has anyone tested the 0 to 60 time for the 2.9 and the 4.0? If not would some of you all be willing to post your times for your 2.9 and 4.0 broncos? I should have mine running this weekend but won’t be able to drive it until I change the tranny shifting over to the cable from the column.
Thanks
 


Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
432
Reaction score
1
Points
16
Vehicle Year
07/86
Make / Model
ford
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
lmao about 10 sec difference. 2.9 is garbage 4.0 is stronger and more reliable.

2.9 is good for a person that just wants a stock b2 or ranger. and for going on small trails.
 

swynx

Active Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Messages
2,401
Reaction score
9
Points
38
Age
31
Location
lewiston idaho
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Mazda
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
In my experience a ranger with 3.73 and 31s with a 2.9. Is about as fast as a ranger on 35s with 3.73 and a 4.0...
 

AllanD

TRS Technical Staff
TRS Technical Advisor
Joined
Jun 1, 2001
Messages
7,897
Reaction score
134
Points
63
Age
62
Location
East-Central Pennsylvania
Vehicle Year
1987... sorta
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
'93 4.0
Transmission
Manual
My vote goes to the 4.0 all other things being equal.


The 4.0 makes more torque by 1300 rpm that a 2.9 ever will make.

anyone who compares the two and thinks the 2,9 "wins" is not driving the 4.0 correctly
 

enjr44

Active Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Mar 24, 2013
Messages
1,143
Reaction score
9
Points
38
Age
80
Location
Renton, WA
Vehicle Year
02 2X4; 08 FX4
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC
Transmission
Automatic
It all comes down to moving air. More air, more fuel, more power. A 4.0 has one additional liter of air going through it every time it goes around. Simple as that.
 

dirtcowboy

Member
V8 Engine Swap
Solid Axle Swap
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
336
Reaction score
5
Points
18
Location
NW Montana
Vehicle Year
1985,1986(2),19
Make / Model
FORD
Engine Size
2.9, 4.6, 4.0, 6.8, 5.0x4
Transmission
Automatic
lmao about 10 sec difference. 2.9 is garbage 4.0 is stronger and more reliable.

2.9 is good for a person that just wants a stock b2 or ranger. and for going on small trails.
So a BII 2.9 runs a 17 second quarter mile ( Motorcraft mag. ) and your supposition is that the same BII with a 4.0 that has 15 more horsepower and 20 lb. ft. of torque does the same quarter in 7 seconds?? Brilliant!!
 

fastpakr

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
U.S. Military - Veteran
V8 Engine Swap
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
8,014
Reaction score
2,829
Points
113
Location
Roanoke, VA
Vehicle Year
1999
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
285/75-16
So a BII 2.9 runs a 17 second quarter mile ( Motorcraft mag. ) and your supposition is that the same BII with a 4.0 that has 15 more horsepower and 20 lb. ft. of torque does the same quarter in 7 seconds?? Brilliant!!
There's a 50+ ft-lb torque difference, but yeah - his 10 second analogy doesn't work.
 

Dune Runner

New Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2012
Messages
385
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
Alpine, Ca
Vehicle Year
1999 4.0
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Automatic
I have owned both and there is a world of difference first time you pull a steep hill.
 

adsm08

Senior Master Grease Monkey
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
Ford Technician
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
34,623
Reaction score
3,613
Points
113
Location
Dillsburg PA
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31X10.50X15
I have owned both and there is a world of difference first time you pull a steep hill.
Or load it down. I run scrap with my truck, anywhere from 200 to 1300 lbs, one month. With the 2.9 I was always up and down between 3rd and 4th on the road to the scrap yard. With the 4.0 in the same truck, literally all else the same because I had a 4.0 trans in it before the engine, I just cruise in 4th the whole way.
 

4x4junkie

Forum Staff Member
TRS Forum Moderator
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Aug 19, 2001
Messages
10,754
Reaction score
583
Points
113
Location
So. Calif (SFV)
Vehicle Year
1990
Make / Model
Bronco II
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
2.9L V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
35x12.50R15
I currently own both and the difference is nothing close to what many make it out to be...

The 4.0L indeed has gobs more torque. But since it only has about 15-20 more HP (depending on which years are compared), it feels as if it's steam starts to run out after you've accelerated above about 3500 RPM, where the 2.9L continues to pull with all what might it has well beyond 5000 RPM.

I have not done any ¼-mile runs in either one of mine, but I'd be surprised if the difference in times was more than 1½ seconds or so (granted, my BII (2.9L) is also probably a good 500lbs lighter). The 2.9L with it's narrower powerband does require more shifting in everyday driving.


All that said, I will swap a 4.0L in place of the 2.9L when (if?) it's time finally comes to an end, since on my model year it's pretty much a bolt-in-plug-play swap. Until then, there's just not enough of a difference between them for me to yank out a perfectly-running engine.
 

trail B2

New Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2009
Messages
1,289
Reaction score
8
Points
0
Location
North Eastern Ca.
Vehicle Year
1986
Make / Model
ford
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
There isn't much difference on the top end and a lot of difference on the bottom end.I drive on the bottom end.When I'm driving around my little town or in the forest there is a lot of 1000 to 1500 rpm time.If I'm really going some where it's duramax.
 

xcross

New Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2014
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Vehicle Year
2006
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Automatic
I do agree with trail B2, The power would be felt in the low and mid, but you will notice the top end is flat.
 

59bisquik

April 2011 OTOTM Winner
OTOTM Winner
Joined
Apr 3, 2008
Messages
485
Reaction score
3
Points
18
Age
49
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
Solid Axle Swap 4x4
I went from a 2.9 with 200k miles to a low mileage 4.0 and then another 4.0 with unknown mileage. Both 4.0's have a bit more power than the 2.9, but after doing it, not enough to warrant the work. After I finish my current 54 project, I am yanking my 4.0 and going 5.0. I should of done that in the first place.

Sorry to be the negative guy, but I am just not happy with it!
 
Last edited:

94xlt4.0

Member
Article Contributor
ASE Certified Tech
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
338
Reaction score
2
Points
18
Location
san diego, ca
Vehicle Year
94,90,02
Make / Model
ford
Engine Size
4.0, 2.9, 4.0
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
I have both a 2.9 in my 90 b2 and a 4.0 in my 94 ranger. The b2 is auto with 3.73s on 31's and is a little sluggish on take off but once your already moving pulls pretty good. The ranger is manual with 3.08s on 235/75r15 and pulls pretty hard like everyone has said up until about 3500-4000rpms. If you are replacing a motor its worth the swap on the plug and play models but i would probably swap a 5.0 on the models that arent plug and play since the wiring comes into play.
 

Kayakcrazy

New Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2014
Messages
196
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
Eastern nc
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9
Transmission
Automatic
I have both a 2.9 in my 90 b2 and a 4.0 in my 94 ranger. The b2 is auto with 3.73s on 31's and is a little sluggish on take off but once your already moving pulls pretty good. The ranger is manual with 3.08s on 235/75r15 and pulls pretty hard like everyone has said up until about 3500-4000rpms. If you are replacing a motor its worth the swap on the plug and play models but i would probably swap a 5.0 on the models that arent plug and play since the wiring comes into play.
I agree, for all the work why not go with something that is a big difference. Nothing wrong with either engine. They both have limitations and do fine for what they were designed for. Lets be realistic, ford didn't really intend either to turn 35 inch tires. I have concluded that as long as the 2.9 is doing well I will probable keep it and when it goes ..... 5.0.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top