Home Ford Ranger Forum Builders Guide How To Tech Other Articles Featured Rangers Readers Rangers Classifieds Shirts & Decals

 
Old 05-12-2009, 12:18 AM   #1
SeedyRom
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3
Vehicle Year: 1998
Vehicle Make: Ford
Vehicle Model: Ranger XLT Extended Cab
Rep Power: 0
SeedyRom is on a distinguished road
Default Compatible engine years for 1998 3.0

I bought a 98 Ranger XLT 2x4 shortbed with a bad 3.0 V-6. The engine spun the bearings after the head gasket blew. Owner said the wife drove it 14 miles back home. I guess the white smoke wasn't noticed
I paid $500 for the truck, it will need a new tailgate and rear bumper due to wife too or the man is passing the buck.

I know the 98 thru 2001 engines are the same, Ford changed the body in 2002 I think. Why engines are compatible with no mods needed besides the 98 thru 2001 engines?? The owner said the 96 and 97 engines are the same as the 1998 and perhaps the 2002 plus are the same engines. Will any other years bolt up??

I searched before posting so I know the Taurus engine will work by flipping the throttle body, using the ECU and harness. That's an$ attractive swap but I need to get back on the road by Friday week.
Thanks.

SeedyRom
SeedyRom is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertisement - Don't want to see the forum ads? Click HERE to find out how to be a Premium Member.


5% Rock Auto Discount Code: 20B2FF503DCF74 Expires: September 28, 2018
Old 05-12-2009, 12:46 AM   #2
Southern3.0
Member
 
Southern3.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Port Nowhere FL
Posts: 700
Vehicle Year: '96
Vehicle Make: Ford
Vehicle Model: Ranger
I use this vehicle for: Punishment
Rep Power: 0
Southern3.0 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Any RWD 3.0 Long block will swap in, there are some differences in intake setups and accessory brackets through the years, but your intake, wiring/electronics and brackets will bolt right up to any RWD 3.0 block. Also some of the 3.0's are flex fuel and the Chambers in the heads are slightly smaller but will work just fine if you have a regular gas engine.

You could use a FWD 3.0 out of a Taurus, but the head gaskets need to be changed over to RWD style gaskets. This is because the lower intake is different, and that changes the coolant flow through the engine. If you use your truck intake and use your truck wiring harness there would be no need to use a Taurus ECU. Oh and the Oil pan and pump pick up are different on a Taurus engine, but the Ranger parts will bolt right in place.
__________________
'95 Ranger, single cab, 4 cyl 5 spd, 2wd
'96 Ranger single cab, 4 cyl 5 spd, 2wd. sold.
'02 Edge...Wrecked it
'91 Ranger, picked it up for $300, sold it for $2500

Last edited by Southern3.0; 05-12-2009 at 12:52 AM.
Southern3.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2009, 02:48 AM   #3
SeedyRom
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3
Vehicle Year: 1998
Vehicle Make: Ford
Vehicle Model: Ranger XLT Extended Cab
Rep Power: 0
SeedyRom is on a distinguished road
Default

So the are the Taurus electrical connectors and ECU the same as the ranger? I may have to rethink the Taurus 3.0 and ride the Dyna Wide Glide to work till finished. I need to think it over because I see a couple of engines for $500 on Car-part.com
SeedyRom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 06:21 AM   #4
dorman68
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 170
Vehicle Year: 1993
Vehicle Make: Ford
Vehicle Model: Ranger
Rep Power: 22
dorman68 is on a distinguished road
Default

Here is interchange info from a salvage index.

MAZDA B-3000 1998 6-183 (3.0L, VIN U) - exact match
RANGER 1998 6-183 (3.0L, VIN U) - exact match
RANGER 1999 6-183 (3.0L), VIN U, thru 7/26/99 - exact match




MAZDA B-3000 2000 (6-183, 3.0L, VIN V) - will fit; except the difference is intake & exhaust manifolds, need to use your current ones.


RANGER 2000 6-183 (3.0L), VIN V (flex fuel) - fit except intake and exh less manifolds, difference is "Flex Fuel"
RANGER 1999 6-183 (3.0L), VIN V (flex fuel), from 7/27/99 - fit expecpt less manifolds, difference is "Flex Fuel"


***Electrical & induction systems vary, compare and switch as necessary.
Available with two different head bolt sizes (10 & 11mm) & valve stem diameters (8 & 7mm)
Uses upper intake manifold ident. #97TF-AA
NON flex fuel engine.
Throttle valve not part of upper intake manifold.
RWD
__________________
1993 Ranger 2.3L,5-spd-2wd - 149,000 mi.(slow as dog-dirt)
1994 Ranger 2.3L,Auto-2wd - 155,000 mi.(Sold)
2005 Corolla LE - AT Trans
dorman68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 07:11 AM   #5
Earl43P
Premium Member

 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: E-City, NC
Posts: 3,161
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Ford
Vehicle Model: Ranger
I use this vehicle for: a driveway ornament, light hauling
Rep Power: 33
Earl43P is just really niceEarl43P is just really niceEarl43P is just really niceEarl43P is just really niceEarl43P is just really nice
Default

http://www.babcox.com/editorial/ar/eb90450.htm may help.
Earl43P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2009, 02:07 AM   #6
Southern3.0
Member
 
Southern3.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Port Nowhere FL
Posts: 700
Vehicle Year: '96
Vehicle Make: Ford
Vehicle Model: Ranger
I use this vehicle for: Punishment
Rep Power: 0
Southern3.0 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Oh wow, I had no clue there where that many changes to the 3.0 over the years, I knew about the roller cam change and flex fuel heads, but that's it.
__________________
'95 Ranger, single cab, 4 cyl 5 spd, 2wd
'96 Ranger single cab, 4 cyl 5 spd, 2wd. sold.
'02 Edge...Wrecked it
'91 Ranger, picked it up for $300, sold it for $2500
Southern3.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2014, 08:16 AM   #7
simplmn80
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: shumway,il
Posts: 6
Vehicle Year: 1993
Vehicle Make: ford
Vehicle Model: ranger xlt
I use this vehicle for: daily driver
Rep Power: 0
simplmn80 is on a distinguished road
Default

what about a 93 engine with obd1?... could i still use a 98 3.0 or a 2000 3.o? I have the same problem with a head gasket, motor is shot... thx!!!
simplmn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2014, 07:29 AM   #8
bucko
Junior Member
 
bucko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 81
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Ford
Vehicle Model: Ranger 4x4
Rep Power: 9
bucko is on a distinguished road
Default

Going from an OBDI to OBDII in the case of an original 93 3.0 to a 98 ro 2000 3.0 is not going to be worth the headache of getting the harness for the ECU, the ECU itself, and the different sensors used in the OBDII setup to convert your 93 over to.
bucko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015, 07:33 AM   #9
Yngbld14
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1
Vehicle Year: 1993
Vehicle Make: Ford
Vehicle Model: Ranger
Rep Power: 0
Yngbld14 is on a distinguished road
Default obd2 motor converted to obd1

I know this is an older thread, but how about going the other way? Can an obd2 engine be substituted for an obd1 engine. I have a 93 ranger with a 3.0 and would mind putting a newer engine in mine. I know you should be able to take the cam sensor out and put in a distributor, but what about the rest?
Yngbld14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks





Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:49 PM.




© 1999-2018 / 959 Media LLC / All Rights Reserved