bluebombersfan
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2008
- Messages
- 361
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Vehicle Year
- 2006
- Make / Model
- Ford
- Engine Size
- 3.0
- Transmission
- Manual
A 1992 3.0 ranger had 20-25 mpg's and my 06 is rated at only 16-21 mpg's. Heck even the old 1992 4.0 were getting 18-23 mpgs. Can someone explain whyeconomy, and now I find myself with a 2006 truck that sucks gas like a 70's vehicle newer model ranger engines have worse mpg's then a decade ago?
I thought newer model engines were supposed to get better fuel .
?????
I thought newer model engines were supposed to get better fuel .
?????