- Joined
- Sep 6, 2013
- Messages
- 2,007
- Reaction score
- 1,329
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Calgary, AB
- Vehicle Year
- 1999
- Make / Model
- Ford
- Engine Type
- V8
- Engine Size
- 5.3
- Transmission
- Automatic
Comparison to Explorer Sport Trac (just for wildbill23c).
http://www.therangerstation.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1610989&postcount=12
RoW Ranger has 1,420kg payload (~3,100lbs!); although, I expect that to be reduced somewhat in USA. Will still need to be greater than the 1,575lbs of Canyon/Colorado as Ford's comparing whose is longer. Substantial increase from the 1,260lb payload of the previous generation Rangers.
If y'all want I could do the same comparison of SuperCab, last gen versus T6. Boxes are same 72" long, T6 is significantly deeper - 20" versus 16.5"; Sport Trac box was 19.75" so comparable. Between wheel wells is 45" versus 40.5"; Sport Trac was on 41.25". Cab is about 8" longer on T6.
Adms08:
Just about every F-150 on lot is SCrew, why would we expect Ranger to be different?
http://www.therangerstation.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1610989&postcount=12
RoW Ranger has 1,420kg payload (~3,100lbs!); although, I expect that to be reduced somewhat in USA. Will still need to be greater than the 1,575lbs of Canyon/Colorado as Ford's comparing whose is longer. Substantial increase from the 1,260lb payload of the previous generation Rangers.
If y'all want I could do the same comparison of SuperCab, last gen versus T6. Boxes are same 72" long, T6 is significantly deeper - 20" versus 16.5"; Sport Trac box was 19.75" so comparable. Between wheel wells is 45" versus 40.5"; Sport Trac was on 41.25". Cab is about 8" longer on T6.
Adms08:
Just about every F-150 on lot is SCrew, why would we expect Ranger to be different?