- Joined
- Oct 22, 2007
- Messages
- 264
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 18
- Location
- Muscatine, Iowa
- Vehicle Year
- 1996, 2003
- Make / Model
- Ford
- Engine Size
- 4.0, 2.3 Duratec
- Transmission
- Manual
Nothing wrong with overengineering a tool. I just pulled my manual on the 2003 and see that you are correct. The newer Rangers seem to have a greater tow rating than the generation before. One of the reasons that you should always resort to your owners manual when checking out all this. Sorry about the confusion.Per Ford my truck is rated to tow 5560lbs with weight distribution hitch. Not to exceed 600lbs tongue weight. GCWR is 9500lbs. Maximum frontal area of the trailer recommended to be under 50 sqare feet.
However, if I planned to tow a trailer over 5000lbs I'd get a bigger truck. That just seems like a lot of struggling for the Ranger. Ford seems to over rate their trucks though.
One thing I would point out is that the Ranger (1996) did not "struggle" with the trailer weight even while being overloaded by that much weight. The biggest issue was pulling off a stop on a hill. Without the granny low and with the 3.27 rear end, it didn't quite have the oomph I would have liked, but because it was over 250 miles of 4 lane highway, I didn't have to worry about it much. It kept up my normal 60mph in 4th which is the manner is which I tow. It did a far better job that what I would have given it credit for before I did it myself. IF I planned on larger trailer loads like this I would use a larger truck. I've done extensive towing and hauling with full sized pickups; very limited with mini-pickups. This is the truck I have right now though.