• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

2.3 into a BII.. Am I crazy?


Beanmachine7000

New Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
2,007
Reaction score
5
Points
0
Location
Tennessee
Vehicle Year
1991
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Manual
So, I'm still in the planning stages of my BII build up, and I'm looking for a motor swap candidate still... Well, me and my dad were discussing about how much we love Ford's Lima engines, and he suggested I put a 2.3 in the BII... Now, I hadn't seriously considered it until now, but I think if it would power a Ranger, it shouldn't have any problem with a BII now should it? I absolutely loved the 2.3 in my 90 Ranger, and I love the 2.5 in my new Ranger... Am I crazy?
 


Hahnsb2

New Member
TRS Banner 2010-2011
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Messages
4,416
Reaction score
36
Points
0
Age
35
Location
Battle Ground WA
Vehicle Year
88-95
Make / Model
Ford-Dodge
Engine Size
4.0-5.2 Turbo
Transmission
Manual
Meh, the 2.3 is underpowered in a ranger and the 2.9 is underpowered in a B2 IMHO. I doubt you would get much better mileage either, my old 2.9 when it was stock could get equal mileage as my dads 4x4 2.3 ranger, smaller the engine the more weight will effect the gas mileage. The 2.3 is a much more bullet proof engine than the 2.9 however. IMHO the 4.0 swap is still the way to go.
 

Beanmachine7000

New Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
2,007
Reaction score
5
Points
0
Location
Tennessee
Vehicle Year
1991
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Manual
Oh, I wouldn't say underpowered... Maybe weak, but the darn things run forever... My dad put his first 2.3 well into 300k, and I still see it running around town today, my first 2.3 easily went to 250k, it's still working hard today, and my 2.5 is at 188k... Only thing we did to any of them was normal maintenance items... My 2.9 died at 177k :( Didn't they put 2.3's into the BII from the factory?
 

Hahnsb2

New Member
TRS Banner 2010-2011
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Messages
4,416
Reaction score
36
Points
0
Age
35
Location
Battle Ground WA
Vehicle Year
88-95
Make / Model
Ford-Dodge
Engine Size
4.0-5.2 Turbo
Transmission
Manual
No, B2s only got 2.8s and 2.9 and supposedly on very rare occasions a diesel.
Yeah, the 2.3s are bullet proof but your mileage isn't going to be as great as you'd expect and it's going to be slow.
 

Beanmachine7000

New Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
2,007
Reaction score
5
Points
0
Location
Tennessee
Vehicle Year
1991
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Manual
Haha, speaking of those diesels, I found one of the turbo Mitubishi's close enough I'd drive to get it, but it has a bad injector pump :( Well, mileage really isn't that big a deal to me... I guess I'm just looking for something a little different to do...
 

Totalled

New Member
Law Enforcement
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Messages
795
Reaction score
3
Points
0
Location
Tumwater, Wa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
8 rabid gophers
Transmission
Automatic
Yes, you are. A BII weighs at least 500 lbs more than a ranger and will be a slug. Not enough available torque.
 

86ford

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
1,450
Reaction score
3
Points
0
Location
rocky river ohio
Vehicle Year
1992
Make / Model
FORD
Engine Size
4.0, abused and misunderstood
Transmission
Manual
if you want to be different swap in a 4.6, 5.4, 4.9, turbo 2.3, super coupe motor.

not a single one would be easy, but it would be different.

86
 

Spartan

New Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
Supercoups were 3.8 supercharged V6 engines.

Throw a 2.3 turbo out of a 83-88 thunderbird Turbo coupe, an SVO Mustang, or a Merkur XR4TI. plenty of power....on a stock LA3 computer it will handle 300 hp easy. plenty to move a bronco 2.
 

fordmandan87

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
851
Reaction score
18
Points
18
Location
Royston, Georgia
Vehicle Year
87/92/97/11
Make / Model
Ford×3/Freightl
Engine Size
/5.0/4.0/7.3/DD15
Transmission
Manual
if you regear the vehicle you can run with the 2.3 with little issues
 

rusty ol ranger

Im a Jeep guy now.
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
12,267
Reaction score
7,274
Points
113
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
Id stick with the 2.9.

A 2.9 with 4.10's will do baout anything you want it to do.

later,
Dustin
 

Beanmachine7000

New Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
2,007
Reaction score
5
Points
0
Location
Tennessee
Vehicle Year
1991
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Manual
Id stick with the 2.9.

A 2.9 with 4.10's will do baout anything you want it to do.

later,
Dustin
I would too, but my 2.9 is sitting in the yard... Whatever I put in is going to be either more reliable, or more powerful, or both... 4.0=more power, 2.3=more reliable... I think the 4.9 would be neat, but waaayy too much work...
 

country0001

Active Member
TRS Banner 2010-2011
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
2,512
Reaction score
14
Points
38
Age
49
Location
Stillwater, OK
Vehicle Year
1990,92
Make / Model
Ford,Ford
Engine Size
4.0,5.0
Transmission
Manual
Thought about doing this myself. Mainly cause I have one in stock. I think it would be nifty, especially if u got it to perform like a 2.9 or better.
 

bobbywalter

TRS Technical Staff
TRS Event Staff
V8 Engine Swap
TRS Technical Advisor
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ugly Truck of Month
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
23,470
Reaction score
4,667
Points
113
Location
woodhaven mi
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
FORD mostly
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
BIGGER
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
sawzall?
Tire Size
33-44
My credo
it is easier to fix and understand than "her"
why do i remember b2's having 4 cyl engines? they didnt have the 2.0 but the 2.3 1 bbl...then the diesel option in 85 iirc...the diesel the 2.3 and the 2.8 were options a few years...had 3 engine choice then it was 2.3-2.9 then 2.9 only...


i had an x truck that was gifted to trenton schools too that was a plow truck. 4.0 equipped...but a non production test truck. had to be sold in parts not whole.


put the axles in my truck. and the rest on many others.


there has to be someone round here with a 4 cyl truck...
 

rusty ol ranger

Im a Jeep guy now.
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
12,267
Reaction score
7,274
Points
113
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
I would too, but my 2.9 is sitting in the yard... Whatever I put in is going to be either more reliable, or more powerful, or both... 4.0=more power, 2.3=more reliable... I think the 4.9 would be neat, but waaayy too much work...
How is the 2.9 less reliable then a 2.3L?....and there not that much weaker then a 4.0. There a good comprimise.

Actually the 300 (4.9L) swap isnt that big of deal if you put on like a 3 inch body lift.

Some here will try to steer you away from that swap, but with the body lift its no harder then a 302, and the 300 is better at performing truck duties then a 302. Its also as reliable as the earths rotation.

later,
Dustin
 

Sevensecondsuv

New Member
RBV's on Boost
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
1,140
Reaction score
7
Points
0
Location
Northern IL
Vehicle Year
Many
Make / Model
All Fords!
Engine Size
Many
Transmission
Manual
...the 300 is...also as reliable as the earths rotation.

later,
Dustin
Much like a 2.3.

Before mine was turbo'd, it wasn't underpowered in the least. It would move the ranger just as fast as the 4.0 moves my explorer. The BII is much closer in weight to a ranger. I see no reason why it couldn't move a BII. Ford was putting them in extended cab ranger's which can't be any lighter than a BII. I say go for it. Make sure you've got 3.73 or 4.10 gear axles and it'll be fine. And you won't have to worry about cracked heads and loss of oil pressure problems associated with the 2.9L POS engine.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Members online

Today's birthdays

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Latest posts

Truck of The Month


Kirby N.
March Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top