• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

2" drop rear shackles


XLTsplash

Active Member
Ford Technician
Joined
Sep 7, 2013
Messages
795
Reaction score
160
Points
43
Age
54
Location
CA
Vehicle Year
1992
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Engine Size
2.3L
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
I've been thinking about lowering the back of my Ranger. I like the back of the truck to sit a little higher than the front, My Ranger just has too much gap above the rear tires. I have found three different brands of 2" lower shackles on ebay . I don't want the truck to look lower in the back than in the front. Has anyone used the 2'' drop shackles on an other wise stock ride height Ranger ? If so what brand did you use and how does you truck look ? Thanks
 


XLTsplash

Active Member
Ford Technician
Joined
Sep 7, 2013
Messages
795
Reaction score
160
Points
43
Age
54
Location
CA
Vehicle Year
1992
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Engine Size
2.3L
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
I bought a pair of the 2'' lowering shackles sold on ebay. The are nice looking with a powder coat finish. They were easy to install. They only lowered my Ranger 1'' at the rear wheel wells. My truck was LF 30'' RF 30''
LR 32.5'' RR 32.5''
It's now LF 30'' RF 30''
LR 31.5'' RR 31.5"
It would have been nice if the shackles lower my truck 1.5'' . I didn't go with the shackle flip because I had read it would lower the truck between 2''& 3'' . I like my truck higher in the back than in the front. So the shackles are good if you just want your Ranger a little lower in the back.
Here are the ones I bought
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1989-1997-Ford-Ranger-2-REAR-Lowering-Shackles-SET-RB-Style-SILENT-Bushings-/261276091599?pt=Motors_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&fits=Make:Ford|Model:Ranger&hash=item3cd544c4cf&vxp=mtr
 

Captain Ledd

Well-Known Member
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
2,384
Reaction score
39
Points
48
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1984, 1997
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
302, 2.3
Transmission
Manual
My credo
If you're not making mistakes, you're not learning.
Since your axle is approximately 1/2 way between the front of the spring and the shackle, whatever height you chop off the shackle, it'll lower the truck about half of that. So an inch sounds right.



to lower the truck 1.5" you need a 3" drop shackle. By this point, you're not running much shackle at all, and will probably have some ride issues.

On the flip side, you can flip your shackles (see what I did there?) and use the original lowering shackle as a lift shackle, as it would now bring the spring closer to the hangar. And will knock off about an inch of the standard flipped shackle height.

Modifying more, flip the shackle, use a universal lowering shackle (the ones with several holes for different heights) and use 4wd lift blocks to get back to a more standard height. But at this point it could get counter-productive quick.

Just other options.
 

XLTsplash

Active Member
Ford Technician
Joined
Sep 7, 2013
Messages
795
Reaction score
160
Points
43
Age
54
Location
CA
Vehicle Year
1992
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Engine Size
2.3L
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Good point, Thank you.
 

XLTsplash

Active Member
Ford Technician
Joined
Sep 7, 2013
Messages
795
Reaction score
160
Points
43
Age
54
Location
CA
Vehicle Year
1992
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Engine Size
2.3L
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Here are before and after pictures of my Ranger lowered with the shorter shackles.

 

scrapper

Active Member
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Nov 27, 2008
Messages
512
Reaction score
63
Points
28
Location
central IL
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
1975 302
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
6+3
Tire Size
33/12.50/15
You could just put an explorer rear end on it but don't use a flip kit. Don't know how much lower that would be. Might be to much?
 

Captain Ledd

Well-Known Member
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
2,384
Reaction score
39
Points
48
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1984, 1997
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
302, 2.3
Transmission
Manual
My credo
If you're not making mistakes, you're not learning.
That will drop it waaaaay far. 6-7" range IIRC. Basically the top of the spring pad to the center of the axle tube multiplied by 2, plus the thickness of the leaf spring stack.
 

JoshT

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
V8 Engine Swap
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
3,868
Reaction score
1,723
Points
113
Location
Macon/Fort Valley, GA
Vehicle Year
1999
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Axle flip = ~5"

Stays close to the same with the Ex axle, unless you also use EX springs which give almost 2" of lift.

Wasn't thinking about that when I put the Explorer axle and springs under the 86 I'm building. Put in "universal lowering springs" to get the axle flip back to around 3", which would have been right with Ranger springs. Instead of a 3" drop, I've got about 1" drop with a flipped axle and 3" drop beams (+V8) on the front. Talk about a rake... Fortunately the bed isn't installed yet so it isn't painfully obvious.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top