• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

89 2.3 swap bad idle


1989rangerob

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Covington GA
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Manual
My credo
If it isn't in the Constitution it is my duty not to obey .
so I went ahead and swapped a new motor into my truck. Seems like a good motor. Unfortunately, I'm having the same problems I did with the old motor. I cleared the computer and tested it. it comes in with, can't read low rpm, can't read high rpm, TPS sensor, rich 02, MAP sensor, and I think that's it. I don't know if these things will fix the problem if I replace them. I may need to clean the injectors. I may need a new crank position sensor. What do y'all suggest?
 


Mikel89us

New Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2011
Messages
702
Reaction score
5
Points
0
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3L (2.5L soon)
Transmission
Manual
Start testing sensors. It may be wiring, so you would test everything before you throw any parts at it. Also, the computer is less likely than anything else, but it could be bad.
 

Mark_88

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2007
Messages
18,554
Reaction score
240
Points
63
Age
68
Location
Ontario, Canada
Vehicle Year
2007
Make / Model
Dordge
Engine Size
3.3 Fuel Injected
Transmission
Automatic
My credo
Love Thy Neighbor
The fluctuating or non readable RPMs is a symptom of the bigger problem and that may be TPS or MAP. If you have a junkyard nearby that has any older trucks or Tempo/Topaz vehicles you can probably grab the MAP from them. They are the same for both as far as I know and the MAP can cause wonky idle...like really wonky idle!

You can try cleaning the contacts on the connector and make sure the vac line is in really good shape and see if that does anything...and spray down the throttle linkage and clean the TPS similarly...before actually swapping the parts...

It's good to have spares of any of these parts because they can be quite expensive and can cause you all kinds of problems...I used to carry spare MAP sensors around with me after my first experience with them failing...never had to replace it after the first one though...
 

fastpakr

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
U.S. Military - Veteran
V8 Engine Swap
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
7,991
Reaction score
2,793
Points
113
Location
Roanoke, VA
Vehicle Year
1999
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
285/75-16
What are the actual codes you're getting (in order)?

Start with Key On, Engine Off tests. Once those are resolved we can move on to the engine running tests.
 

tomw

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Aug 15, 2007
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
46
Points
48
Location
toenails of foothills NW of Atlanta
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
ford
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Engine Size
lima bean
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
vertical and above ground
I would be checking ground and power cables. All that stuff going away at the same time to me indicates a 'common problem' causing them all to appear flaky to the computer.
There is a ground cable from the back of the cylinder head (I think) that is often overlooked after doing the hoisting. It goes from the head to the firewall and is the ground for the cab, I believe.
If you lose cab ground, all the electrical gizzards can appear goofy. You can provide 'backwards' ground via powered components, the brake pedal, and so on, but it is not good enough to give reliable signals to the computer.
To check quickly, but not for amperage carrying, you can put one connector of a VOM on the + terminal, and the other on the -, read voltage. Then put the - on a clean, grounded bolt on the cab, and compare. The voltage from + to - battery should be close to voltage from + to - on the cab if there is a good ground. If they differ, you have a bad connection somewhere. You can bypass the ground by providing a temporary ground using a jumper cable from - to the cab bolts and see if the KOEO tests report back better.
tom
 

1989rangerob

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Covington GA
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Manual
My credo
If it isn't in the Constitution it is my duty not to obey .
I would be checking ground and power cables. All that stuff going away at the same time to me indicates a 'common problem' causing them all to appear flaky to the computer.
There is a ground cable from the back of the cylinder head (I think) that is often overlooked after doing the hoisting. It goes from the head to the firewall and is the ground for the cab, I believe.
If you lose cab ground, all the electrical gizzards can appear goofy. You can provide 'backwards' ground via powered components, the brake pedal, and so on, but it is not good enough to give reliable signals to the computer.
To check quickly, but not for amperage carrying, you can put one connector of a VOM on the + terminal, and the other on the -, read voltage. Then put the - on a clean, grounded bolt on the cab, and compare. The voltage from + to - battery should be close to voltage from + to - on the cab if there is a good ground. If they differ, you have a bad connection somewhere. You can bypass the ground by providing a temporary ground using a jumper cable from - to the cab bolts and see if the KOEO tests report back better.

tom
I made sure to reinstall that cable. I remember cranking it down.
 

1989rangerob

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Covington GA
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Manual
My credo
If it isn't in the Constitution it is my duty not to obey .
What are the actual codes you're getting (in order)?

Start with Key On, Engine Off tests. Once those are resolved we can move on to the engine running tests.
KOEO 22,23

Running: 12, 21, 23, 42, 13, 52
 
Last edited:

1989rangerob

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Covington GA
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Manual
My credo
If it isn't in the Constitution it is my duty not to obey .
I was going to cut and paste these, but just for your reference they can be found here...

http://www.therangerstation.com/tech_library/2digitcodes.shtml

Looks like idle control and temp sensor are out of whack for sure...
They're in my chilton's manual. There's a whole section explaining how to pull codes. What it doesn't really provide, is a solution. I don't want to spend a bunch more money on this pig if I don't have to. I guess I'll test the sensors next. The coolant temp sensor and sending unit are new. They may have misread because the engine wasn't totally warmed up yet
 
Last edited:

1989rangerob

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Covington GA
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Manual
My credo
If it isn't in the Constitution it is my duty not to obey .
Tps is good. The motor dies when I disconnect the map sensor. I can keep it running by depressing the accelerator but the miss is still there. I disconnected the main vacume line. The rpms went up and the miss was still there. I popped of the plug connectors on the exhaust side and they all had spark. I tested the coil on the intake side with a volt meter and it was good. I took the DIS off and tested it at auto zone and it was good. I tested the crank position sensor with a bolt meter by hand turning the motor and reading the change and it passed. I'm kind of stumped
 
Last edited:

tomw

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Aug 15, 2007
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
46
Points
48
Location
toenails of foothills NW of Atlanta
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
ford
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Engine Size
lima bean
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
vertical and above ground
Crossed plug wiring problem considered? Such would lead to definite miss at idle, perhaps hidden miss at higher rpms.
tom

added:
You can test the temp sensor with a VOM, and the resistance should change with temperature change. The computer doesn't know beans about the temp sensor as far as 'is it good..?' It just takes the resistance given... unless it has infinite or zero resistance. Those would be, to my knowledge, the cases where it gripes about the temp sensor as it is obviously not in range of possible temperatures...
The TPS I have has to be 'zeroed' or adjusted if replaced. If you put a meter on the TPS it should show a sweep of resistance as it is moved through its travel. If it has dropout (goes to zero or infinite) then it is likely bad. If it cannot go to the low end, perhaps by adjustment, then it may be bad. Some needed the oval shaped holes opened just a smidge to get the proper 'closed' throttle reading, IIRC.
Given the codes, I would be checking for presence of the 5v reference voltage at the TPS and check the resistance of the temp sensor. I don't think the temp sensor has the 5v but I might be mistaken.
tom
 
Last edited:

1989rangerob

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Covington GA
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Manual
My credo
If it isn't in the Constitution it is my duty not to obey .
Crossed plug wiring problem considered? Such would lead to definite miss at idle, perhaps hidden miss at higher rpms.
tom

added:
You can test the temp sensor with a VOM, and the resistance should change with temperature change. The computer doesn't know beans about the temp sensor as far as 'is it good..?' It just takes the resistance given... unless it has infinite or zero resistance. Those would be, to my knowledge, the cases where it gripes about the temp sensor as it is obviously not in range of possible temperatures...
The TPS I have has to be 'zeroed' or adjusted if replaced. If you put a meter on the TPS it should show a sweep of resistance as it is moved through its travel. If it has dropout (goes to zero or infinite) then it is likely bad. If it cannot go to the low end, perhaps by adjustment, then it may be bad. Some needed the oval shaped holes opened just a smidge to get the proper 'closed' throttle reading, IIRC.
Given the codes, I would be checking for presence of the 5v reference voltage at the TPS and check the resistance of the temp sensor. I don't think the temp sensor has the 5v but I might be mistaken.
tom[/QUOTE

The tps is good. I already did the vom test on it. The crank sensor is good and giving a reading through the dis back to the computer. The coolant temp sensor and sending unit are new and reading correctly in the dash. The insulation on the wires is good. The wires are connected to the right plugs. There are numbers on the coil packs and the wire lengths are kind of obvious. The ect code was in reference to the engine coolant temperature according to the chilton's manual. I know there is also a temp sensor in the front side of the intake manifold. That isn't the ect sensor though, or maybe it is? Anyways, I just re shoed the rear brakes and they're working just fine now. The e brake still doesn't work though. Thanks for the input.
 

1989rangerob

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Covington GA
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Manual
My credo
If it isn't in the Constitution it is my duty not to obey .
I replaced the computer for the the whole truck. It fixed the miss and the idle. Go friggen figure
 

scotts90ranger

Well-Known Member
RBV's on Boost
Joined
Feb 28, 2001
Messages
7,929
Reaction score
4,227
Points
113
Location
Dayton Oregon
Vehicle Year
1990, 1997
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Engine Size
2.3 Turbo
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6
Tire Size
35"
Probably a bad internal ground, as the ground for all of the sensors you had codes for are most likely common (or the power, same deal), it is 25 years old :)
 

1989rangerob

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Covington GA
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Manual
My credo
If it isn't in the Constitution it is my duty not to obey .
Well Scott, now it's losing power in 4th and fifth. I replaced the fuel sending unit thinking that it was the problem. Still doing it
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Kirby N.
March Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top