BrutalPanda
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2017
- Messages
- 41
- Reaction score
- 5
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 28
The 2.9 auto I test drove was a dog, had trouble making it to 55 and then the steering was so loose and the boards under the coils didn't help so I immediately took it back to the owner after 1/2 mile. I might bet beat on 0-60, but my needle doesn't slow down after 45 now. Consistent speed increase up until 70.Im guessing because of the taller deck heights of the V8s/I6s and the 3.0 being slated for low hooded tauruses it was pry for clearence issues.
Good to hear your 2.9 runs good. I take flack for it all the time but ive always felt the 2.9 even in stock form could hold its own against even the "mighty" 4.0. I guess to me the 4.0 was always kinda dissapointing considering its displacement advantage over the 2.9. For being 1.1L bigger i always thought it shoulda been wayyy ahead of the 2.9, and to some it is, but ive never really seen it. A 2.9/5sp its a tough little combo to beat, and wayyy above the crap it was competeing against (2.8 GM, Nissans 3.0 and yotas V6 of that time), replacing it with the 3.0 really was a step backwards.
Ive driven a few 3.0/5sp trucks, and just letting up the clutch and stabbing the throttle from an idle roll doesnt give that "snap" the 2.9 does. I never drove a OHV 4.0 with a 5sp, but the auto ones, while admittingly stronger then the 2.9/autos, just were kinda, meh.
Sent from my XT1565 using Tapatalk