Serving Ford Ranger, Bronco II, Explorer & Mazda B-Series Owners Since 1999

 
 
Home Forums Info - Technical Info - Other TRS News Photo Galleries Shirts & Decals Parts Store Classifieds

 

Go Back   The Ranger Station Forums > Axles, Brakes, Wheels & Tires > Ranger Axles

Notices

Ranger Axles Dana 28, Dana 35, Ford 7.5 & Ford 8.8

Post New Thread Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-23-2012, 08:53 PM   #13
cookiemonster
Junior Member
 
cookiemonster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012

Year: 1993
Make: ford
Model: ranger

Posts: 73
Rep Power: 3
cookiemonster is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gwaii View Post
i've done the d44 outers on the 35,as well as the 44 swap(and pretty much any other combination you may think of).
the outers add a bit of width,but the rear adapters will add about the same amount.the adapters,as has been said in an earlier post will not be a strength issue.an f 150 rear will add too much width.

i highly recommend this for tire sizes up to 33'',35'' will be ok but won't take as much of a beating.
i beat the crap out of mine with 33s,never a problem.
while the bigger brakes and hub locks are an advantage,the biggest plus of this swap is the bearing spacing,as the 35 has the wheel bearings pretty much right up against each other...the 44 has some space between them so there is much more resistance to side load damage.
i used outers from a '96 f150 on mine.
Thank you, very much! Are the 96 outers, the ones that require no reaming? Or is that just for the bronco spindles?

Looks like im gonna hopefully start tearing apart my d44 tomoro! Pretty stoked, thanks again. Will probably have more questions upon the install, So keep an eye out, your help would be awesome!
__________________
93 ranger "power ranger"
4in RC suspension
33's gy wrangler sa's
aem intake
custom exhaust
cookiemonster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2012, 09:07 PM   #14
gwaii
2010 OTOTY Winner

 
gwaii's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: haida gwaii

Year: 1991
Make: ford
Model: ranger
Engine: 460
Class: 4x4
Used For: stupid stuff

Posts: 4,156
Rep Power: 22
gwaii is a splendid one to beholdgwaii is a splendid one to beholdgwaii is a splendid one to beholdgwaii is a splendid one to beholdgwaii is a splendid one to beholdgwaii is a splendid one to beholdgwaii is a splendid one to behold
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cookiemonster View Post
Thank you, very much! Are the 96 outers, the ones that require no reaming? Or is that just for the bronco spindles?
on mine i was doing a cut-and-turn anyway,so i ended up just welding the lower part of the 44 arm onto the 35 arm for the lower ball joint hole.

i'll have to take another look at it to see what else i did,that was a few years(and projects)ago....but i still have it.
__________________
just the facts,ma,am-joe friday
gwaii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2012, 09:14 PM   #15
kryptonitecb
Premium Member

 
kryptonitecb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Fort Worth, TX

Year: 1994
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 4.0
Class: 4x4
Used For: daily driver, trail ready

Posts: 990
Rep Power: 8
kryptonitecb is just really nicekryptonitecb is just really nicekryptonitecb is just really nicekryptonitecb is just really nicekryptonitecb is just really nice
iTrader: (1)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by railman View Post
you can't get adapters for the front...they wouldn't fit over the hubs....so run adapters for the rear....Greg ( 97TrailrigDD ) has them and wheels his rig hard....so I know they aren't a weak link...
I've seen adapters for 5x5 to 5x4.5, is it not possible to have the center hole enlarged to fit over the hub? The reason I ask is cause I plan on doing the 44 outers and buying new wheels isn't a viable option for me. I have trail worthy fab wheels and I don't have the funds to buy new inners (they run ~$100 each IIRC).

Sent from the road while ignoring traffic
kryptonitecb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2012, 09:48 PM   #16
4x4junkie
Mall-Rated
 
4x4junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: So. Calif (SFV)

Year: 1990,1994
Make: Ford
Model: Bronco II, Ranger
Engine: 2.9L, 4.0L
Used For: Crawling over things

Posts: 8,003
Rep Power: 10
4x4junkie is a name known to all4x4junkie is a name known to all4x4junkie is a name known to all4x4junkie is a name known to all4x4junkie is a name known to all4x4junkie is a name known to all
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kryptonitecb View Post
I've seen adapters for 5x5 to 5x4.5, is it not possible to have the center hole enlarged to fit over the hub? The reason I ask is cause I plan on doing the 44 outers and buying new wheels isn't a viable option for me. I have trail worthy fab wheels and I don't have the funds to buy new inners (they run ~$100 each IIRC).

Sent from the road while ignoring traffic
It's 5x5.5" to 5x4.5". The D44 hub itself is much too big to fit within a 4.5" bolt circle.

FWIW, the bigger brakes would be the only real reason I see for this swap myself, I've had 0 issues out of the stock D35 setup using Timken brand bearings and the Warn Jeep hubs. That is not to say the D44's bearing setup isn't better (it most certainly is), but I'd maybe try switching to Timken brand bearings & races (SET-37) if you're having issues with it, which seems to solve the problem for a lot of people.
__________________
'90 Bronco II XLT
5" lift (Skyjacker Jeep coils), D35 & 8.8" w/5.13s (locked), 1354 dual T-case, 35x12.50s

'94 Ranger XLT
6" Skyjacker, ARB D44 front, Detroit 8.8" rear, Atlas 4.3, 33s
4x4junkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2012, 02:24 AM   #17
kryptonitecb
Premium Member

 
kryptonitecb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Fort Worth, TX

Year: 1994
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 4.0
Class: 4x4
Used For: daily driver, trail ready

Posts: 990
Rep Power: 8
kryptonitecb is just really nicekryptonitecb is just really nicekryptonitecb is just really nicekryptonitecb is just really nicekryptonitecb is just really nice
iTrader: (1)
Default

I was using the Timken bearings but was blowing them up just as fast as the cheap ones. My problem is the wheel/tire combo I have are around 100 lbs each (37" tires on trailworthyfab hummer wheels). This puts enough stress on the bearings that during the winter when I couldn't ride I was going through bearings once a month or two. Good to know that I can't get the adapters to fit before I started to do this. Would've been a huge waste of money for nothing.

Sent from the road while ignoring traffic
kryptonitecb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2012, 08:16 PM   #18
4x4junkie
Mall-Rated
 
4x4junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: So. Calif (SFV)

Year: 1990,1994
Make: Ford
Model: Bronco II, Ranger
Engine: 2.9L, 4.0L
Used For: Crawling over things

Posts: 8,003
Rep Power: 10
4x4junkie is a name known to all4x4junkie is a name known to all4x4junkie is a name known to all4x4junkie is a name known to all4x4junkie is a name known to all4x4junkie is a name known to all
iTrader: (0)
Default

How are you tightening your D35's bearings? I'm thinking regardless of your tires the Timken bearings should last at least some amount longer than some cheapo ones...


I went out and looked at the D44 hubs on my Ranger, I'm now thinking there could be some possibility you could make it go together, however I'm still not sure how comfortable I'd be with it. You'd probably end up with around 5/16" thereabouts between the studs and the I.D. of the adapter on the 4.5" side (which I'd certainly want the adapters be made from steel, I think that's too thin for aluminum ones). The next thing would be how much meat would be left on your wheel centers if you widen them. It'll be tight getting a nut & socket in between there for sure.
__________________
'90 Bronco II XLT
5" lift (Skyjacker Jeep coils), D35 & 8.8" w/5.13s (locked), 1354 dual T-case, 35x12.50s

'94 Ranger XLT
6" Skyjacker, ARB D44 front, Detroit 8.8" rear, Atlas 4.3, 33s

Last edited by 4x4junkie; 06-24-2012 at 08:27 PM.
4x4junkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2012, 11:34 PM   #19
kryptonitecb
Premium Member

 
kryptonitecb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Fort Worth, TX

Year: 1994
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 4.0
Class: 4x4
Used For: daily driver, trail ready

Posts: 990
Rep Power: 8
kryptonitecb is just really nicekryptonitecb is just really nicekryptonitecb is just really nicekryptonitecb is just really nicekryptonitecb is just really nice
iTrader: (1)
Default

The centers have tons o room. However at the dfw meet today hazmat mentioned that the d44 hubs are to big like you mentioned so it's time to stop procrastinating and get the d60 under the truck.

I was tightening the bearings a bit tight. Last time I did the bearings I only seated the bearings then tightened the outer spindle nut as much as possible. So far its lasted longer but I use the bike as much as possible. 45 mpg on a motorcycle beats out 15 mpg in the truck IMO.

Sent from the road while ignoring traffic
kryptonitecb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2012, 09:10 PM   #20
4x4junkie
Mall-Rated
 
4x4junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: So. Calif (SFV)

Year: 1990,1994
Make: Ford
Model: Bronco II, Ranger
Engine: 2.9L, 4.0L
Used For: Crawling over things

Posts: 8,003
Rep Power: 10
4x4junkie is a name known to all4x4junkie is a name known to all4x4junkie is a name known to all4x4junkie is a name known to all4x4junkie is a name known to all4x4junkie is a name known to all
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kryptonitecb View Post

I was tightening the bearings a bit tight.
The inner nut only needs 15 inch-pounds, no more (some say 16 inch-lbs, close enough), then the outer nut goes on to 225-250ft-lbs (making sure the inner nut & washer doesn't try to turn with it).

If you got a 60 on hand though, then what the heck are you waiting for?
__________________
'90 Bronco II XLT
5" lift (Skyjacker Jeep coils), D35 & 8.8" w/5.13s (locked), 1354 dual T-case, 35x12.50s

'94 Ranger XLT
6" Skyjacker, ARB D44 front, Detroit 8.8" rear, Atlas 4.3, 33s
4x4junkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 04:58 PM   #21
kryptonitecb
Premium Member

 
kryptonitecb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Fort Worth, TX

Year: 1994
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 4.0
Class: 4x4
Used For: daily driver, trail ready

Posts: 990
Rep Power: 8
kryptonitecb is just really nicekryptonitecb is just really nicekryptonitecb is just really nicekryptonitecb is just really nicekryptonitecb is just really nice
iTrader: (1)
Default

Money, of all the threads started saying they where doing a cheap swap easily turned into a $1500+ job. I have college, no place to work on it, and non existent funds to use. And I won't be that guy that uses a credit card to finance a SAS.

Sent from the road while ignoring traffic
kryptonitecb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 07:38 PM   #22
4x4junkie
Mall-Rated
 
4x4junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: So. Calif (SFV)

Year: 1990,1994
Make: Ford
Model: Bronco II, Ranger
Engine: 2.9L, 4.0L
Used For: Crawling over things

Posts: 8,003
Rep Power: 10
4x4junkie is a name known to all4x4junkie is a name known to all4x4junkie is a name known to all4x4junkie is a name known to all4x4junkie is a name known to all4x4junkie is a name known to all
iTrader: (0)
Default

No doubt, I hear you there...

Well, good luck on your D35 then... I think you should get at least a couple years out of it with your setup if you get the preload right on it. I put MT/R-Ks on my rig early last year and with the steel rims they are probably within 15lbs of what yours are (MT/R-Ks are heavy-ass tires). And that's on bearings that have already endured 12 years & 70K miles with my prior BFGs and the mileage under my Ranger before I did the D44 on it.

Alright, giving the thread back to the OP.

__________________
'90 Bronco II XLT
5" lift (Skyjacker Jeep coils), D35 & 8.8" w/5.13s (locked), 1354 dual T-case, 35x12.50s

'94 Ranger XLT
6" Skyjacker, ARB D44 front, Detroit 8.8" rear, Atlas 4.3, 33s
4x4junkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 AM.


© 1999-2012 / 959 Media LLC / All Rights Reserved

The Ranger Station is in no way affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.

[Legal Notices]   [Advertising/Vendors]
 
Also check out SSP Central for Special Service & Non-Traditional Police & Fire Vehicles