Serving Ford Ranger, Bronco II, Explorer & Mazda B-Series Owners Since 1999

 
 
Home Forums Info - Technical Info - Other TRS News Photo Galleries Shirts & Decals Parts Store Classifieds

 

Go Back   The Ranger Station Forums > Axles, Brakes, Wheels & Tires > Wheels & Tires

Notices

Post New Thread Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-11-2012, 04:27 PM   #1
maclgallant
Member
 
maclgallant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Moncton, NB Canada

Year: 2008
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger XL 4x4 supercab
Engine: 4.0l
Used For: daily driver, light mud boggin. trail riding

Posts: 130
Rep Power: 8
maclgallant is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Send a message via MSN to maclgallant
Default 15x8 vs 16x8 info

well my tires are almost worn out, and it's almost time for some new rubber

my stock wheels are 15x7 and i have 31x10.5x15 mounted on them.
15x7 leaves you very limited for big tires, the biggest you can go is 33x10.5 or 32x11.5.... so obviously i need new wheels if i want bigger tires

so these is where i got stuck going back and forth....15x8 vs 16x8... most people seem to prefer 15x8... but after reseaching tires availble for both wheels i notice on significiant thing ( and i did this for over a 2 years, yes i'm not exagiration 2 freaking years lol)

16x8 offers WAY more skinny tall tires ex 33x10.5 or 33x11.5 or 35x10.5 etc etc which as we all know is cheaper, better to ride (subjective) , better in snow, rain, and easier on the truck parts (wheel bearings etc) .. and most of all way easier to FIT!!!!!

so if anyone out there is looking to stuff some 33's, dont like the look of 33x10.5 , but don't want 33x12.5 285x75rx16(33x11.5x16) is a very common size, i have even seen 255x85x16 (33x10x16) "interco trxus"


i dont know, what do you guy's think? seems that we should all be running 16's since we could stuff 33's easier 285x75rx16
maclgallant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2012, 07:34 PM   #2
cdawall
Member

 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ellsworth AFB

Year: 2005
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger Edge
Engine: 4.0L V6
Class: 4x4
Used For: trails/daily driver

Posts: 493
Rep Power: 7
cdawall will become famous soon enough
iTrader: (0)
Default

Most people argue 15's are better since as prices sit now they are cheaper. I went to 16's on because 15's are disappearing. No stock truck has anything less than a 16" to clear brakes. Just not worth it to go to 15's you would be setting yourself up for failure.
__________________
Wheeler '05 Ranger Edge SAS'd, 5.38's, D60/D60U, 38.5" TSL SX's, build thread
cdawall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2012, 09:49 PM   #3
maclgallant
Member
 
maclgallant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Moncton, NB Canada

Year: 2008
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger XL 4x4 supercab
Engine: 4.0l
Used For: daily driver, light mud boggin. trail riding

Posts: 130
Rep Power: 8
maclgallant is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Send a message via MSN to maclgallant
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdawall View Post
Most people argue 15's are better since as prices sit now they are cheaper. I went to 16's on because 15's are disappearing. No stock truck has anything less than a 16" to clear brakes. Just not worth it to go to 15's you would be setting yourself up for failure.
thats also another good point
in my case federal couragia 275/85/16(32.9x11.1x16) is cheaper than 33x12.5x15 10$ per tire
maclgallant is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:30 PM.


© 1999-2012 / 959 Media LLC / All Rights Reserved

The Ranger Station is in no way affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.

[Legal Notices]   [Advertising/Vendors]
 
Also check out SSP Central for Special Service & Non-Traditional Police & Fire Vehicles