• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

Possible inside news for Ranger replacement in US


DHEM

New Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2011
Messages
39
Reaction score
4
Points
0
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
2005
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
3.0
Transmission
Automatic
I know this is an old topic that pretty much everyone is sick of hearing, but Mike Levine said something on pickuptrucks.com that I found to be disturbing.

"Ford has been working on a Transit Connect-based pickup (ugly, from what I hear) and something totally different and small. Neither is official but they are being seriously considered. Stay tuned. I'm digging."


'Posted by: Mike Levine | Jul 1, 2011 6:10:43 PM'

No evidence, just speculation. I hope that its not true though.
Incase if you dont know what a transit connect is, this is it:

A turkish built fwd unibody micro van. :shok:
 


RangerBoy94

Active Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
1,403
Reaction score
24
Points
38
Location
Northern California
Vehicle Year
1968
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
360CDI
Transmission
Automatic
I've seen those driving around town all the time. They have them at my Ford dealer as well.
 

wrecking-crew

New Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2008
Messages
2,791
Reaction score
25
Points
0
Age
34
Location
dirty jersey
Vehicle Year
06 chevy
Make / Model
88 ranger
Engine Size
6 cylinders
Transmission
Manual
Why does that sound like a bad idea?
 

Musick17

New Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2009
Messages
643
Reaction score
4
Points
0
Location
Lincoln, IL
Vehicle Year
2002
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3L
Transmission
Manual

Black'03LevelII

New Member
TRS Banner 2010-2011
Joined
Sep 1, 2007
Messages
968
Reaction score
25
Points
0
Age
49
Location
Brunswick, Ohio
Vehicle Year
2003
Make / Model
FORD
Engine Size
4.0L SOHC
Transmission
Manual
I don't know, I've seen a couple of them and got to drive one the other day. I kind of like 'em. They ride better than those flippin sprinters in my opinion.
 

4.0B2

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
10,700
Reaction score
151
Points
63
Location
Walls, MS
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0 v6
Transmission
Automatic
They ride pretty dang good!
 

LearjetMinako

New Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
12
Points
0
Age
38
Location
Moore, OK
Vehicle Year
1996
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3L 140ci
Transmission
Manual
Sounds like Ford is trying to make a smaller version of the Honda Ridgeline.
 

94 lngbd

New Member
TRS Banner 2010-2011
Joined
Nov 24, 2007
Messages
862
Reaction score
7
Points
0
Age
59
Location
Lakewood,Wa
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
ford
Engine Size
2.3l
Transmission
Manual
those transit connects aren't even rear wheel drive, so imagine a bone head loading the back end beyond its load ability & taking all the weight off of the front drive wheels
 

straycat

New Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Oct 6, 2009
Messages
5,733
Reaction score
77
Points
0
Vehicle Year
02 06 and 2012
Make / Model
Jeeps
Transmission
Automatic
They have been around for awhile. I had a TV repairman come over twice last year to do a warranty job and a follow up and he was driving one. It was really cool. He let me drive it around the block a couple of times. He told me he had it for a year already and he really loves it. Lots of room for hauling all his repair equipment and TV replacement parts or TV when he has to replace a TV under warranty. I see them all over the area here in Florida.

But...this is not the Ranger replacement!!!! Still waiting to see if the F100 series is coming ..........If I like it I might buy it the next year after it's out....I never buy a first year production, got to work out the bugs....lol
 

noahkenny

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2010
Messages
121
Reaction score
4
Points
0
Location
Cullman, Alabama
Vehicle Year
1989
1995
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3l
Transmission
Manual
Ugly?? Hell yea!! But I could find a lot use uses for a truck like that. Most of us here dont exactly drive pantie peelers!!!:icon_rofl:
 

ZMan

Forum Staff Member
TRS Forum Moderator
MTOTM Winner
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Jan 5, 2003
Messages
3,778
Reaction score
406
Points
83
Age
38
Location
Medina, Ohio
Vehicle Year
1992,1994
Make / Model
Ford Rangers
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Drop
4/4, bagged
I'm sure it will do just fine in the fleet market, which is where most rangers were being sold anyway. (think: parts stores)
 

4.0B2

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
10,700
Reaction score
151
Points
63
Location
Walls, MS
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0 v6
Transmission
Automatic
i was told the other day that companies could still order 2012(but everything is identical to the 2011; just made for 2012) rangers as fleet vehicles, they just wouldn't be sold to the public (unless you bought a used fleet vehicle)
 

DHEM

New Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2011
Messages
39
Reaction score
4
Points
0
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
2005
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
3.0
Transmission
Automatic
well something thats a unibody and only available in fwd only with only a 4 cyl engine wouldn't work for a truck. I mean if Ford is really serious about a unibody truck, Ford should consider using the same chassis as what the Escape is based on, at least that has awd and v6 available. A transit Connect pickup wouldnt be good for towing or hauling much. Plus its ugly.
 

hopster

Member
Ford Technician
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Sep 10, 2008
Messages
420
Reaction score
9
Points
18
Location
Bedford, IN
Vehicle Year
1990,1989
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9, 4.0, 5.0 can't decide
Transmission
Manual
transit connects share a lot of parts with escapes
 

ZMan

Forum Staff Member
TRS Forum Moderator
MTOTM Winner
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Jan 5, 2003
Messages
3,778
Reaction score
406
Points
83
Age
38
Location
Medina, Ohio
Vehicle Year
1992,1994
Make / Model
Ford Rangers
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Drop
4/4, bagged
well something thats a unibody and only available in fwd only with only a 4 cyl engine wouldn't work for a truck. I mean if Ford is really serious about a unibody truck, Ford should consider using the same chassis as what the Escape is based on, at least that has awd and v6 available. A transit Connect pickup wouldnt be good for towing or hauling much. Plus its ugly.
Most of the rangers I see in my area are owned by napa, autozone, advanced, o'reillys, etc. All they use them for is parts delivery. Its getting rarer and rarer that I see someone driving a ranger for personal use, much less actually TOWING with it. Its a very niche thing, if you're going to be hauling serious loads, get a 1/2 ton.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top