Serving Ford Ranger, Bronco II, Explorer & Mazda B-Series Owners Since 1999

 
 
Home Forums Info - Technical Info - Other TRS News Photo Galleries Shirts & Decals Parts Store Classifieds

 

Go Back   The Ranger Station Forums > Axles, Brakes, Wheels & Tires > Ranger Axles

Notices

Ranger Axles Dana 28, Dana 35, Ford 7.5 & Ford 8.8

Post New Thread Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-24-2011, 10:54 PM   #1
gjm4l
Member
 
gjm4l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Charlotte North Carolina

Year: 1992
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger xlt, regular cab
Engine: 2.3L 4cyl
Class: 2wd
Used For: speeding ticket prevention, hauling junk and myself around

Posts: 462
Rep Power: 9
gjm4l will become famous soon enoughgjm4l will become famous soon enough
iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to gjm4l
Default opinion: which gears for 2.3

I've unexpectly had not one but two sets of 7.5 gears fall into my lap and now I'm not sure which set to run. I get to choose from 3.73 or 4.10's.

Truck details are in the sig. It currently runs 3.54 gears and stock 205/75r14 (26x8) tires. Since moving to the city I don't plan to change tire sizes on it any more. My goal is to provide the poor 2.3 with some more pep while not losing mpg and I honestly hope to gain mpg which will happen either way in the city but I'm wondering if 4.10's will be to steep for the long trips on the interstate.

I used to have an 06' 2.3l with 4.10s and loved it, peppy and good mpg, but the 2.3's between 06' and 92' obviously aren't the same so I'm just looking for popular opinion as to whether 4.10's will be perfect or to much

Thanks in advance
__________________
The thing I love about a mullet is it doesn't just happen. You make that choice
gjm4l is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2011, 11:24 PM   #2
Sunk
Resident Brewer
 
Sunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bothell, WA

Year: 1999
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 2.5
Class: 2wd
Used For: Titties n beer

Posts: 6,651
Rep Power: 48
Sunk has a reputation beyond reputeSunk has a reputation beyond reputeSunk has a reputation beyond reputeSunk has a reputation beyond reputeSunk has a reputation beyond reputeSunk has a reputation beyond reputeSunk has a reputation beyond reputeSunk has a reputation beyond reputeSunk has a reputation beyond reputeSunk has a reputation beyond reputeSunk has a reputation beyond repute
iTrader: (6)
Default

3.73 probably won't be a noticeable difference from 3.54. I'd say go with the 4.10 depending how fast you drive on the freeway.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 91rokkrawler View Post
i also got kicked out of barnes and noble. long story there.... lets just say they don't like when you put the bibles in the fiction section...
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.C. Fields View Post
Once, during prohibition, I was forced to live for days on nothing but food and water.
Sunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2011, 11:28 PM   #3
RavoHimself
Member
 
RavoHimself's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: enfield, ct

Year: 1993
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 4.0L
Class: 4x4
Used For: DD

Posts: 1,050
Rep Power: 10
RavoHimself will become famous soon enoughRavoHimself will become famous soon enough
iTrader: (0)
Default

how often will you be be doing highway? the 3.73's and 4.10's will be very close. on the highway you're looking at llike a 300rpm difference. i know the 2.3's like a higher cruise for more power so about 2500/2700 would probably be good. also try to stay at 65mph. better mileage.
__________________
93 ranger, 4.0L, ex cab, standard, 4x4, 2" coils, 15x8 AR Baja, 33x10.5" bfg at, cab lights
Build Thread
........to be modified........
-Ryan-
RavoHimself is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2011, 11:29 PM   #4
4.0B2
MALL CRAWLER POST WHORE!

 
4.0B2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Walls, MS

Year: 1988
Make: Ford
Model: Bronco II
Engine: 4.0 v6
Class: 4x4
Used For: Taking my Money

Posts: 9,965
Rep Power: 51
4.0B2 has a reputation beyond repute4.0B2 has a reputation beyond repute4.0B2 has a reputation beyond repute4.0B2 has a reputation beyond repute4.0B2 has a reputation beyond repute4.0B2 has a reputation beyond repute4.0B2 has a reputation beyond repute4.0B2 has a reputation beyond repute4.0B2 has a reputation beyond repute4.0B2 has a reputation beyond repute4.0B2 has a reputation beyond repute
iTrader: (4)
Default

yeah, one step up.. you won't notice. i say try the 4.10's.. if you don't like 'em (doubtful IMO) put in the 3.73's.
4.0B2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2011, 12:49 AM   #5
baddis
Premium Member


 
baddis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Avon,il

Year: 1997
Make: ford
Model: explorer
Engine: 4.0
Class: 4x4
Used For: dd and having fun

Posts: 1,180
Rep Power: 21
baddis will become famous soon enoughbaddis will become famous soon enough
iTrader: (0)
Default

you never said if you have an auto or 5 speed
__________________
Joined: 24-July 04
Member No.: 43

IF IT ISN'T BROKE I HAVEN'T TRIED
baddis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2011, 08:16 PM   #6
gjm4l
Member
 
gjm4l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Charlotte North Carolina

Year: 1992
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger xlt, regular cab
Engine: 2.3L 4cyl
Class: 2wd
Used For: speeding ticket prevention, hauling junk and myself around

Posts: 462
Rep Power: 9
gjm4l will become famous soon enoughgjm4l will become famous soon enough
iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to gjm4l
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by baddis View Post
you never said if you have an auto or 5 speed
my bad that ain't in the siggy, yep 5 speed. I couldn't imagine having a 4banger auto

I cruise at around 60-70mph on the highway no more than 5 over limit typically, and depending on traffic my work commute can vary from mostly 45/35mph roads to mostly 55mph roads. I hit the interstates enough for it to matter including some 3-4hr each way trips (quarterly-ish). Which is why I am asking because I am pretty confident I want the 4.10's but with no tach I don't even know what my lima 2.3 rpms are at my cruising speeds or even where they are most efficient but I do know much over 70 and I lose mpgs now (may be because of the getting choppy cheap M&S style tires I run at the moment)

Also just for reference I'm getting about 22mpg solid regardless of whether it's city or highway. Now that I think about it when I first got it I used to get closer to 26mpg but that was running some street tires (white walls no less)

Thanks for the replies keep em coming
__________________
The thing I love about a mullet is it doesn't just happen. You make that choice
gjm4l is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2011, 09:52 PM   #7
Insanejughead
Premium Member


 
Insanejughead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Missouri

Year: '94, '86
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger, Thunderbird
Engine: 2.3T
Class: 2wd Street
Used For: Enlightenment of the soul.

Posts: 2,702
Rep Power: 22
Insanejughead is a name known to allInsanejughead is a name known to allInsanejughead is a name known to allInsanejughead is a name known to allInsanejughead is a name known to allInsanejughead is a name known to all
iTrader: (5)
Default

3.73 + 4.10 = 7.83

7.83 / 2 = 3.91



There, that solves it. You should go with the best of both worlds and install a 3.91 to 1 gear ratio rear axle.

(Did you like my math? Hahaha, thought so. You can give me loads of rep points, I don't mind.)



I have 3.73s in my ranger and they seemed fine. They're even better now that I'm turbo'ed. I'm getting 22-24 mpg with them, and it didn't matter on which engine it was.

However, the 3.45s in my turbo Thunderbird leave me wanting more "oomph" in my go (I get 28 or slightly more mpg though... So I have little room to complain.)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by daniel3507 View Post
Insane is nuttier than a squirrel turd
Quote:
Originally Posted by dasfinc View Post
Go [prove me wrong] and I will eat my shoe, film it, and put it on youtube.

Last edited by Insanejughead; 09-25-2011 at 09:56 PM.
Insanejughead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2011, 08:55 PM   #8
gjm4l
Member
 
gjm4l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Charlotte North Carolina

Year: 1992
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger xlt, regular cab
Engine: 2.3L 4cyl
Class: 2wd
Used For: speeding ticket prevention, hauling junk and myself around

Posts: 462
Rep Power: 9
gjm4l will become famous soon enoughgjm4l will become famous soon enough
iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to gjm4l
Default

I do like the math, I think it should be the ratio I have to the maximum ratio I have available which would be (3.54x4.10)/2=3.82 lol but it's looking like I'm gonna go with 4.10's since the rangers my commuter most of the time here in charlotte I figure if it's too to bad I can just upsize tires next time I have to make that investment. But at the same time I'm trying to figure out what size tires I can run if I get some dreambeams for the 92'
__________________
The thing I love about a mullet is it doesn't just happen. You make that choice
gjm4l is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
2.3l, 3.73, 4.10, gear swap, mpg

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 PM.


© 1999-2012 / 959 Media LLC / All Rights Reserved

The Ranger Station is in no way affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.

[Legal Notices]   [Advertising/Vendors]
 
Also check out SSP Central for Special Service & Non-Traditional Police & Fire Vehicles