• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

pictures please


89DANGERANGER

New Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
200
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
kentucky
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
ford
Engine Size
2.9
Transmission
Automatic
now seeing some pics im thinking maybe......3'' body lift. then slap the 32s on there and then adding a leveling kit with 2'' blocks in the back. 5'' lift with 32s. sound good?
 


88ranger2.95sp

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2007
Messages
159
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
34
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9
Transmission
Manual
My exact setup :icon_thumby:. Ranger #2 has a 3" body lift, 3" blocks in the rear, and stacked, welded washer coil spacers (~1.5") in the front. ~5" lift. Running 32x10.50 swamper radials, I have no rub on anything, even at full stuff and full lock. My D28 Ujoints hate that:bawling:. No pics tho; I don't have a digital camera. Hope this helps.

Rob
 

MudSlutII

New Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9
Transmission
Manual
89 ranger with 3" body lift and 33s my friend....

 

89DANGERANGER

New Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
200
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
kentucky
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
ford
Engine Size
2.9
Transmission
Automatic
89 ranger with 3" body lift and 33s my friend....

looks exactly identicle to mine. do the 33s rub on the radius arms? i know the 33s on my bronco do but its stock. do u have a 2.9 or a 4.0 i have a 2.9 but i still want ok gas mileage.
 

MAKG

New Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
4,634
Reaction score
19
Points
0
Location
California central coast
Vehicle Year
1991
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Manual
Just so you know....you can fit 31's on that generation RBV with no lift at all.

Might as well save the headaches.
 

Tpenner93

New Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2008
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
canada
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Automatic
93 ranger stock no lifting required 31x10.5x15
 

89DANGERANGER

New Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
200
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
kentucky
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
ford
Engine Size
2.9
Transmission
Automatic
ok. if i was to get the 33s....would they fit on a 7'' wheel? i still have stock wheels. and for some reason...my front end sita higher than my rear on my ranger. just by a tad bit. is this bcuz of old shocks and springs or something else. it doesnt have a leveling kit
 

Kona

06/2014 OTOTM Winner
Canada Military - Veteran
OTOTM Winner
ASE Certified Tech
Ham Radio Operator
Joined
Nov 10, 2007
Messages
621
Reaction score
2
Points
18
Location
Kamloops BC
Vehicle Year
1991
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
7"
Tire Size
35x12.50x15
Short answer NO , long answer NO the tire deforms to much and it is a bitch to get them on and off and most tire shops will not even consider it.
 

89DANGERANGER

New Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
200
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
kentucky
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
ford
Engine Size
2.9
Transmission
Automatic
so a 32s the biggest to fit on a 7'' wheel. gotcha.
i would get 31s but i just dont see them doin as well. they are kind of small.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Members online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Kirby N.
March Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top