Stock explorer vs 300 then?
You can junkyard mild build the 302 still. Only reason for it....and I don't leave much stock.
How do you junkyard mild build a 300?
I have, and will still build all of these engines and know the results dyno and track.
My e350 never fell to a stock 90,s or 80,s anything. With a trainload of miles on it.
You go ahead and have a gear to gear with a gen 1 psd. You won't be bragging...empty or loaded. Just pissed.
Big block tows just fine, that is not the argument...beating the all things same psd....no. falling on its face in the mountains.....yes. pretty simple.
Youre on crack if you think a 4.0 has any place in this debate.
You can junkyard build a 300. Theres a guy on youtube running 10 and 11s in a maverick. IIRC he has less then 5k in the whole thing including the car.
Furthermore its very difficult to find a stock 7.3 obs anymore. I dont know what year your van was but if its after 97 they really cranked the PSD up (525ftlb IIRC). So id sure as hell hope itd beat a 460.
Mountain towing yes ill give it that as turbos do better at altitude then N/A. The 7.3 also got better mileage.
But apples to apples ill put my money on the 460 everytime.
Remember in the 80s when ford saddled 300 powered F150s with a 2.47 rear and the 3sp manual with O/D? They couldnt do it with a 302 because the clutch woulda been fried before it got backed off the carrier.
But either way im done here. I made my points and we are both to hard headed tu give either way. So lets just leave it be.
Apolgies to
@PetroleumJunkie412 for muddying up tbe thread.