Bagging my 96 ranger


Untamed_backroad

New member
Joined
Apr 26, 2017
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Vehicle Year
1996
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Automatic
I want to see the setups ive done it before but my truck has sat for 3 years static dropped my truck club has convinced me to bag my 2 just need to know what everyone is running gonna do the back 2 link and for now keep the I beam eventually going Toyota clip what y'all got
 


Rock Auto 5% Discount Code: 248EE46702D889 Expires: October 1, 2019

86beater

New member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Texas
Vehicle Year
1986
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9 V6
Transmission
Automatic

86beater

New member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Texas
Vehicle Year
1986
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9 V6
Transmission
Automatic
Theres a few of mine. Djm ibeams, heim joint radius arms, slam specialties ss5 front ss6 rear, viair 480c dual, 7 gallon aluminum tank, smc 1/2" valves, avs 7 switchbox, broncoii gas tank, all 1/2" line with slow downs, 2bars with a watts link, suzuki samurai shocks front, gonna run ranger oem in back bla bla bla! all work done by me
 
Last edited:

Audiotech80

New member
Joined
Jan 15, 2019
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
What is that wishbone looking linkage to the front of your control arms and I beam ? Never seen that before as a part for bagging I beam ranger . I'm looking to do the same on my 94 . I have some questions.
 

Audiotech80

New member
Joined
Jan 15, 2019
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
Theres a few of mine. Djm ibeams, heim joint radius arms, slam specialties ss5 front ss6 rear, viair 480c dual, 7 gallon aluminum tank, smc 1/2" valves, avs 7 switchbox, broncoii gas tank, all 1/2" line with slow downs, 2bars with a watts link, suzuki samurai shocks front, gonna run ranger oem in back bla bla bla! all work done by me
I see your photos of your gen 1 . Why so much camber? Is it something about gen 2 or 3 rangers that have more positive camber when slammed out? Every 94+ I see don't lean in like the square bodys. Wasnt sure if you did drop beams
 

adsm08

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Ford Technician
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
31,617
Reaction score
1,009
Points
113
Location
Dillsburg PA
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31X10.50X15
I see your photos of your gen 1 . Why so much camber? Is it something about gen 2 or 3 rangers that have more positive camber when slammed out? Every 94+ I see don't lean in like the square bodys. Wasnt sure if you did drop beams
I can't speak for the OP's situation, but up to 87 (maybe 88) the 2wd beams had a funky ball joint arrangement with stupid small holes for the camber adjusters, which left about 2* as the biggest one you could get. It makes aligning them with a lot of lift or drop and PITA.
 


Top